"Phil Lee" <phil.lee@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
news:%23glypC5EHHA.2464@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Are the WSE3 team considering adding compression to WSE?
>
> There is one attempt at adding compression here:
> http://weblogs.shockbyte.com.ar/rodolfof/archive/2006/08/03/8362.aspx?Pending=true
> but unfortunately it doesn't work with username over certificate, or at
> least I can't get it to work.
>
> Compression would be very useful over lower bandwidth links. And note
> that Http compression isn't useful when you have encrypted data since
> encrypted data is generally not compressible. I need compression of the
> serialized xml payload before encryption.
>
> Regards
> Phil Lee
>

"Phil Lee" <phil.lee@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
news:ecsJeZ9EHHA.3780@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Pablo,
>
> I'll give it another try. Can I email you direct if I can't get it to
> work?
>
> Regards,
> Phil Lee
> "Pablo Cibraro [MVP]" <pcibraro@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uCRXgW8EHHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> No, the WSE 3.0 team will not add any feature to the product. All the
>> efforts are now on the development of WCF.
>> I personally moved the Rodolfo's code to WCF,
>> http://weblogs.asp.net/cibrax/archive/2006/09/13/WS_2D00_Compression-for-WCF-RC1-_2800_September_2900_.aspx
>>
>> That's strange, did you configure the compression assertion to run
>> before the security assertion ?. I think the compression assertion does
>> not work if it runs after the security assertion.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pablo Cibraro.
>>
>> "Phil Lee" <phil.lee@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
>> news:%23glypC5EHHA.2464@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Are the WSE3 team considering adding compression to WSE?
>>>
>>> There is one attempt at adding compression here:
>>> http://weblogs.shockbyte.com.ar/rodolfof/archive/2006/08/03/8362.aspx?Pending=true
>>> but unfortunately it doesn't work with username over certificate, or at
>>> least I can't get it to work.
>>>
>>> Compression would be very useful over lower bandwidth links. And note
>>> that Http compression isn't useful when you have encrypted data since
>>> encrypted data is generally not compressible. I need compression of the
>>> serialized xml payload before encryption.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Phil Lee
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

"Pablo Cibraro [MVP]" <pcibraro@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uCRXgW8EHHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Hi Phil,
>
> No, the WSE 3.0 team will not add any feature to the product. All the
> efforts are now on the development of WCF.
> I personally moved the Rodolfo's code to WCF,
> http://weblogs.asp.net/cibrax/archive/2006/09/13/WS_2D00_Compression-for-WCF-RC1-_2800_September_2900_.aspx
>
> That's strange, did you configure the compression assertion to run before
> the security assertion ?. I think the compression assertion does not work
> if it runs after the security assertion.
>
> Regards,
> Pablo Cibraro.
>
> "Phil Lee" <phil.lee@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
> news:%23glypC5EHHA.2464@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Are the WSE3 team considering adding compression to WSE?
>>
>> There is one attempt at adding compression here:
>> http://weblogs.shockbyte.com.ar/rodolfof/archive/2006/08/03/8362.aspx?Pending=true
>> but unfortunately it doesn't work with username over certificate, or at
>> least I can't get it to work.
>>
>> Compression would be very useful over lower bandwidth links. And note
>> that Http compression isn't useful when you have encrypted data since
>> encrypted data is generally not compressible. I need compression of the
>> serialized xml payload before encryption.
>>
>> Regards
>> Phil Lee
>>
>
>