That was meant to say a pure binary reference not a project reference so the
control should have been fine. Our project was a little too complex to break
out, when we heard others we having an issue we stopped creating the test app
to simulate the issue in a more trivial way for demonstration purposes and
just moved our code out of initialize component. It seems to be specific to
user controls on panels. The more panels you have the worse off you are.
Our best guess at the time was some sort of designer bug.
[quoted text, click to view] "joeycalisay" wrote:
> > When putting user controls in panels on a form, sometimes the designer
> just
> > loses
> > them.
>
> The only way I experienced this before was if there were problems in control
> code generation.
>
> >We eliminated those
> > possibilities by using a purbinary reference and the control was still
> lost
> > on ocassion.
>
> purbinary? what does this word mean?
>
> > Any ideas what is going on and how to stop this it has made dealing with
> > these particular forms a pain since we can't use the designer with the
> > controls.
>
> Perhaps I can only help you if you can present me sample code of your
> controls and their designer classes.
>
>
[quoted text, click to view] > When putting user controls in panels on a form, sometimes the designer
just
> loses
> them.
The only way I experienced this before was if there were problems in control
code generation.
[quoted text, click to view] >We eliminated those
> possibilities by using a purbinary reference and the control was still
lost
> on ocassion.
purbinary? what does this word mean?
[quoted text, click to view] > Any ideas what is going on and how to stop this it has made dealing with
> these particular forms a pain since we can't use the designer with the
> controls.
Perhaps I can only help you if you can present me sample code of your
controls and their designer classes.
[quoted text, click to view] > Our best guess at the time was some sort of designer bug.
Ok then, if you want to put it that way, then so be it...
[quoted text, click to view] "WXS" <WXS@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:39C33793-EE61-46F6-9216-D428769C0087@microsoft.com...
> That was meant to say a pure binary reference not a project reference so
the
> control should have been fine. Our project was a little too complex to
break
> out, when we heard others we having an issue we stopped creating the test
app
> to simulate the issue in a more trivial way for demonstration purposes and
> just moved our code out of initialize component. It seems to be specific
to
> user controls on panels. The more panels you have the worse off you are.
> Our best guess at the time was some sort of designer bug.
>
>
> "joeycalisay" wrote:
>
> > > When putting user controls in panels on a form, sometimes the designer
> > just
> > > loses
> > > them.
> >
> > The only way I experienced this before was if there were problems in
control
> > code generation.
> >
> > >We eliminated those
> > > possibilities by using a purbinary reference and the control was still
> > lost
> > > on ocassion.
> >
> > purbinary? what does this word mean?
> >
> > > Any ideas what is going on and how to stop this it has made dealing
with
> > > these particular forms a pain since we can't use the designer with
the
> > > controls.
> >
> > Perhaps I can only help you if you can present me sample code of your
> > controls and their designer classes.
> >
> >
> >
