<discussion@discussion.microsoft.com> wrote:
>2003 .net UPGRADE does NOT have VSS 6.0d
>
>Why o why do they not make a patch available for upgraders. Stupid stupid
>stupid.
>
>So, 6.0c is the latest on the upgrade and if you check the microsoft site,
>its also the latest there.
>
>"Martin Brown" <replytogroop@jfjfj.kfkfk> wrote in message
>news:OG78pFGpDHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> What I don't understand is where in my previous post did I mention MSDN?
>>
>> You have said in a previous post that you had Visual Studio 2003. Visual
>> Studio 2003 and Visual Studio 6.0d come on the same disk. If you have one
>> you have the other. No need to "MAKE THE PATCH AVAILABLE ONLINE THEN I CAN
>> UPGRADE" as you should already have it on disk. I thought my post made
>this
>> clear.
>>
>> You might also want to try checking your project's Source Safe bindings.
>You
>> can do this by selecting the File -> Source Control -> Change Source
>Contol
>> menu item. This brings up a dialog with a list of project in. You should
>> have an entry in the Server Binding column and a tick in the connected
>> column next to each project. If you don't try selecting the project and
>then
>> using either the connect or bind toolbar buttons to conect to the source
>> safe database.
>>
>> "news.microsoft.com" <discussion@discussion.microsoft.com> wrote in
>message
>> news:urzYkoDpDHA.3616@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> > I have 6.0c thats what I got, thats what it installed, I dont have MSDN.
>> > which part of that don't you understand?
>> >
>> > *gets his clue bat*
>> >
>> > MAKE THE PATCH AVAILABLE ONLINE THEN I CAN UPGRADE
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Martin G. Brown" <l@l.l> wrote in message
>> > news:uZzxtb%23oDHA.424@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> > > If you have Visual Studio 2003, Source Safe 6.0d came bundled with it.
>> Try
>> > > looking on the DVD/CDs it came on. On my DVD it is in
>D:\VSS\SETUP.EXE.
>> > For
>> > > some reason 6.0d is not available on the internet. By the way it is
>not
>> > part
>> > > of the standard VS 2003 install, it has to be run separately.
>> > >
>> > > It still ought to work with 6.0c though.
>> > >
>> > > Martin
>> > >
http://www.mgbrown.com >> > >
>> > > "ozbear" <ozbear2@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:3fa96bab.130329343@news-server...
>> > > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:33:54 +0100, "news.microsoft.com"
>> > > > <discussion@discussion.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >Its what I have and its not on the web download and I dont have
>MSDN.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >Its a bug, deal with it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > If you feel that it is a bug, upgrade to 6.0d.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>