I don't know about specific articles, but there is one thing that we
learned the hard way that you you might want to know about. Dataset and
DataTable objects are serializable while DataView and DataRow objects
are not. If you are planning on crossing process boundaries (as when
you have physically separate tiers) you'll get non-serializable errors
unless you take special steps on your own to deal with this issue.
Have A Better One!
John M Deal
[quoted text, click to view] Prasad Patil wrote:
> hi,
> I have a three tier application, I have a method in the datalayer which
> should either return a (dataset or dataview or datrow), i need to know which
> should be the best possible option, are there any links or documents which
> can help me understand.
>
> Thanx in advance.
>
In order for a DataView to be of any use, it needs a reference to a
DataTable. You can always create a view locally, but as John mentioned,
Views aren't serializable so that's going to take a lot of fun out of trying
to remote them.
Go with a DataTable/DataSet
--
W.G. Ryan MVP (Windows Embedded)
TiBA Solutions
www.tibasolutions.com |
www.devbuzz.com |
www.knowdotnet.com [quoted text, click to view] "John M Deal" <johndeal@necessitysoftware.com> wrote in message
news:#ltceMVxEHA.2876@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> I don't know about specific articles, but there is one thing that we
> learned the hard way that you you might want to know about. Dataset and
> DataTable objects are serializable while DataView and DataRow objects
> are not. If you are planning on crossing process boundaries (as when
> you have physically separate tiers) you'll get non-serializable errors
> unless you take special steps on your own to deal with this issue.
>
> Have A Better One!
>
> John M Deal
>
> Prasad Patil wrote:
> > hi,
> > I have a three tier application, I have a method in the datalayer which
> > should either return a (dataset or dataview or datrow), i need to know
which
> > should be the best possible option, are there any links or documents
which
> > can help me understand.
> >
> > Thanx in advance.
> >
> > Prasad
