Thank you. Reading the Slate article reminded me how f*cked the U.S. remains
"smith" <rcsTAKEOUT@smithvoiceTAKEOUT.com> wrote in message
news:Jl2sd.206$0r.146@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Here's a comment:
>
>
http://slate.msn.com/id/2089424 >
>
> And here's another: The webtv sdk did kinda drift off, but here's a place
> for somewhat related dev information that's a bit more up to date than
April
> 2003:
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/tv/default.mspx >
>
> Robert Smith
> Kirkland, WA
>
www.smithvoice.com >
>
> "clintonG" <csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com> wrote in message
> news:OSPfFgN2EHA.2192@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >I used to develop sites to ensure they were accessible to WebTV users
when
> > the client's typology warranted doing so. I haven't done much with that
> > type
> > of customer lately. With December 31, 2006 looming closer and closer a
> > search of the web proves the digital TV device market is heating up. For
> > those that are not aware, that date is when all analog television
> > broadcasting must by U.S. law be broadcast digitally.
> >
> > With MSN TV [1] for developers showing its last update as April 2003 it
> > gives me the "what the hell" response primarily because there are plenty
> > of
> > articles that discuss at least briefly how Microsoft is doing this or
that
> > with regard to digital TV; an 'era' which I contend will usher in a wave
> > of
> > business activity that could eclipse the dot com era.
> >
> > Thought and comments?
> >
> > --
> > <%= Clinton Gallagher, "Twice the Results -- Half the Cost"
> > Architectural & e-Business Consulting -- Software Development
> > NET csgallagher@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com
> > URL
http://www.metromilwaukee.com/clintongallagher/ > >
> >
> > [1]
http://developer.msntv.com/Default.asp > >
> >
>
>