assemblies, namespaces, etc. added to it. It is also fully
backwards-compatible with .Net Framework 1.1. See
"Smithers" <A@B.com> wrote in message
news:uDEyonA7HHA.980@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Hi Kevin.
>
> What do you mean by <"It will install the other 2.">
>
> Are you saying that the 3.0 installation will give you the actual 1.0,
> 1.1, and 2.0 libraries on disk? Or are you simply going off of the
> backwards compatability angle... that any .NET app written with an earlier
> version will run on a later version of the framework?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
> "Kevin Spencer" <unclechutney@nothinks.com> wrote in message
> news:uTZgCj86HHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> It's actually a lot simpler than that. Start with .Net 3.0, and then
>> stop. It will install the other 2.
>>
>> --
>> HTH,
>>
>> Kevin Spencer
>> Microsoft MVP
>>
>> DSI PrintManager, Miradyne Component Libraries:
>>
http://www.miradyne.net >>
>> "Bond" <G2jitesh@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1188561541.184788.194330@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Aug 30, 8:02 am, jpdsurf <jpds...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>> I've just done a reinstall of XP and I want to know in what order
>>>> should I
>>>> install the .net Frameworks. I've nothing but problems with them in
>>>> the
>>>> past. Should I do 3, 2 and then 1? Or should install just 3 or what?
>>>> Many
>>>> thanks for the one who could help me with this.
>>>
>>> Hi friend !!!!
>>>
>>> I got the Best Thing which will 100% solve your Query, just refer to
>>> the to the following URL
>>>
>>>
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e2h7fzkw(vs.71).aspx
>>>
>>> thank you
>>> jitesh tolar
>>>
http://www.intelcs.com/IT-Companies/ >>>
>>
>>
>
>