| Groups | Blog | Home |
dotnet internationalization : Problem accessing satellite assemblies in VS2005
I have an ASP.NET application that stores strings in .resx files in the
App_GlobalResources folder. These files are sent to another company for translation and returned in satellite assemblies, which are then placed in the bin folder of the web application. When deployed the application uses the satellite assemblies just fine, but when I try to debug in VS2005 these satellite assemblies are ignored. The current culture is set programatically based on user preferences. Is there any way to acess the satellite assemblies when debugging?
Hi,
I hope this answer your question: One of the new linker switches: "...assemblydebug- This switch is available on the Linker Debugging Project property page through the Debuggable Assembly property. This switch is equivalent to the [Debuggable] attribute, which the compiler adds to indicate to the runtime that the assembly can be debugged. The values passed through the attribute tell the runtime to track information important to the debugger and to turn off just-in-time (JIT) optimization. ..." Taken from: http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/03/03/VisualCNET/#S8 -------------------- [quoted text, click to view] > Thread-Topic: Problem accessing satellite assemblies in VS2005 > thread-index: Acb56gpcPIAXJwB/SgWp+rBzMcStow== > X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 64.65.129.114 > From: =?Utf-8?B?cGRjb3NzZXR0ZQ==?= <pdcossette@discussions.microsoft.com> > Subject: Problem accessing satellite assemblies in VS2005 > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:05:01 -0700 > Lines: 10 > Message-ID: <A6F3D304-5665-42F6-B3FC-7B18ADAE5F30@microsoft.com> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="Utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > Importance: normal > Priority: normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 > Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.internationalization > Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl > Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.internationalization:2533 > NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250 > X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.internationalization > > I have an ASP.NET application that stores strings in .resx files in the > App_GlobalResources folder. These files are sent to another company for > translation and returned in satellite assemblies, which are then placed in > the bin folder of the web application. When deployed the application uses > the satellite assemblies just fine, but when I try to debug in VS2005 these > satellite assemblies are ignored. The current culture is set programatically > based on user preferences. > > Is there any way to acess the satellite assemblies when debugging? > > -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they originated.
I should have mentioned that my code was written in C# -- the link you gave
was for C++. The problem isn't just that I can't debug the assemblies -- the problem is that the satellite assemblies aren't even being used when i run the code in the VS 2005 IDE. Has anyone out there got this to work? [quoted text, click to view] "Leili Pournasseh[MSFT]" wrote:
> Hi, > I hope this answer your question: > One of the new linker switches: "...assemblydebug- This switch is available on the Linker Debugging Project property > page through the Debuggable Assembly property. This switch is equivalent to the [Debuggable] attribute, which the > compiler adds to indicate to the runtime that the assembly can be debugged. The values passed through the attribute tell > the runtime to track information important to the debugger and to turn off just-in-time (JIT) optimization. ..." > Taken from: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/03/03/VisualCNET/#S8 > > > -------------------- > > Thread-Topic: Problem accessing satellite assemblies in VS2005 > > thread-index: Acb56gpcPIAXJwB/SgWp+rBzMcStow== > > X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 64.65.129.114 > > From: =?Utf-8?B?cGRjb3NzZXR0ZQ==?= <pdcossette@discussions.microsoft.com> > > Subject: Problem accessing satellite assemblies in VS2005 > > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:05:01 -0700 > > Lines: 10 > > Message-ID: <A6F3D304-5665-42F6-B3FC-7B18ADAE5F30@microsoft.com> > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; > > charset="Utf-8" > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 > > Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message > > Importance: normal > > Priority: normal > > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 > > Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.internationalization > > Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl > > Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.internationalization:2533 > > NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250 > > X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.internationalization > > > > I have an ASP.NET application that stores strings in .resx files in the > > App_GlobalResources folder. These files are sent to another company for > > translation and returned in satellite assemblies, which are then placed in > > the bin folder of the web application. When deployed the application uses > > the satellite assemblies just fine, but when I try to debug in VS2005 these > > satellite assemblies are ignored. The current culture is set programatically > > based on user preferences. > > > > Is there any way to acess the satellite assemblies when debugging? > > > > > > > -- > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Use of included script samples are subject to the > terms specified at http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm > > Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread > from which they originated. >
"pdcossette" <pdcossette@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote...
[quoted text, click to view] >I should have mentioned that my code was written in C# -- the link you gave > was for C++. The problem isn't just that I can't debug the assemblies -- > the > problem is that the satellite assemblies aren't even being used when i run > the code in the VS 2005 IDE. > > Has anyone out there got this to work? The IDE does not really depend on the machine settings -- it usually tries to be independent of the machine settings. The easiest way to fake this is to explicitly set the CurrentUICulture explicitly in your code very early while debugging. -- MichKa [Microsoft] NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Technical Lead Globalization Infrastructure, Fonts, and Tools Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
I'm already setting the CurrentUICulture in code -- the IDE uses the .resx
files in App_LocalResources just fine, but doesn't use the global resources stored in satellite assemblies-- [quoted text, click to view] "Michael S. Kaplan [MSFT]" wrote:
> "pdcossette" <pdcossette@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote... > >I should have mentioned that my code was written in C# -- the link you gave > > was for C++. The problem isn't just that I can't debug the assemblies -- > > the > > problem is that the satellite assemblies aren't even being used when i run > > the code in the VS 2005 IDE. > > > > Has anyone out there got this to work? > > The IDE does not really depend on the machine settings -- it usually tries > to be independent of the machine settings. > > The easiest way to fake this is to explicitly set the CurrentUICulture > explicitly in your code very early while debugging. > > -- > MichKa [Microsoft] > NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Technical Lead > Globalization Infrastructure, Fonts, and Tools > Blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/michkap > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with > no warranties, and confers no rights. > >
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |