|
|
You're in the
dotnet jscript
group:Watch internet package
dotnet jscript:
Microsoft User
this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities. Install now to maintain the security of your computer from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could allow an malicious user to run executable on your computer. This update includes the functionality = of all previously released patches. System requirements: Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to: - MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later - MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later - MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation: Customers should install the patch = at the earliest opportunity. How to install: Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use: You don't need to do anything after installing this item. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles = can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. http://support.microsoft.com/ For security-related information about Microsoft products, please = visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site http://www.microsoft.com/security/ Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable = to respond to any replies. ---------------------------------------------- The names of the actual companies and products mentioned = herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.
THIS IS A VIRUS -- DO NOT OPEN!
[quoted text, click to view] "Paulina Morchio T." <ithxes_napvp@wrh.com> wrote in message = Microsoft All Products | Support | Search | =news:e4Tn%23EbkDHA.1488@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Microsoft.com Guide =20 Microsoft Home =20 =20 Microsoft User this is the latest version of security update, the "October = 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates all known security = vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS = Outlook Express as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities. = Install now to maintain the security of your computer from these = vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could allow an malicious user = to run executable on your computer. This update includes the = functionality of all previously released patches. =20 System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP=20 This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and = later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later =20 Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the = earliest opportunity.=20 How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed = dialog box.=20 How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this = item.=20 Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles = can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For = security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the = Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us.=20 Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an = unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein = are the trademarks of their respective owners. =20 Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe =20 =A92003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use =
[quoted text, click to view] "Scott!!" <plentyspam@here.com> wrote in message news:ODkjXcbkDHA.1800@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > Hello Scott, > > I've just deleted the originals messages of these threads from my > newsreader. Now you've replied to all three and I have them back again. > Groan!! :-(( Let me get this straight...We're all supposed to NOT reply to messages YOU'VE removed from YOUR newsreader? I'm sorry, I didn't get that memo. [quoted text, click to view] > > You say DO NOT OPEN, but there's nothing *to* open. Perhaps in YOUR newsreader, but in mine these messages contain attachments, which contain the virus! [quoted text, click to view] > > FYI these are not viruses. They *were* originally, but the virus code has > been removed which is why they are 14K instead of over 100K. The size is due > to the graphic not any virus code. They are harmless now, except that they > waste space and people's time. Again, perhaps in YOUR newsreader but not in mine and perhaps other people's as well. [quoted text, click to view] > > If you are going to respond to these messages, have the decency not to > **include** the message in your response. You are propagating the message as > if you were infected yourself. > Actually, I'm not. You must open the attachments in order to propagate the virus, not the message that contains them. [quoted text, click to view] > Thanks, > On behalf of everyone. > Sorry, I wasn't at the meeting where YOU were elected to speak for EVERYONE. [quoted text, click to view] >
It's people like you that make these newsgroups an unfriendly environment.
The simple fact is that if you don't like a post, you are free to ignore it. The fact that you may have deleted a post and my reply brought it back is basically your problem. I'm not here (and I suspect many people besides me as well) to keep your filters working. To even think that we should somehow know what you've filtered out is ludicrous! Besides, my message was directed to those who aren't familiar with these posts and who haven't filtered out these messages because they don't know any better. Your post is selfish and downright mean. The purpose of these NG's are to help people. My post does, your post doesn't. My OE shows the attachments. Are you saying that it's not?! Are you a fortune teller or a psychic? No, you're not! Stop telling us that because your system isn't showing the attachment that ours isn't either. Again, ludicrous! The only one wasting bandwith here is you. It doesn't matter if you believe my message is 2 weeks late (which is strange that you would say that because these posts are from 10/12 and 10/13) and I am trying to help someone who perhaps has not been personally informed by you of the fraudulent and malicious nature of these posts. The bottom line is that my message will help anyone who reads it. You messages are just you whining. Get over it and get over yourself! [quoted text, click to view] "Scott!! Hey, Moron" <plentyspam@here.com> wrote in message news:%23TUyVcckDHA.2268@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > Jeez Scott, > > >> I've just deleted the originals messages of these threads from my > >> newsreader. Now you've replied to all three and I have them back again. > >> Groan!! :-(( > > > >Let me get this straight...We're all supposed to NOT reply to messages > >YOU'VE removed from YOUR newsreader? I'm sorry, I didn't get that memo. > > Well now you know - some people delete these posts. You are ADDING to the > problem not solving anything. > > --------------------------------------- > >> > >> You say DO NOT OPEN, but there's nothing *to* open. > > > >Perhaps in YOUR newsreader, but in mine these messages contain attachments, > >which contain the virus! > > > > FYI etc, etc. > > > >Again, perhaps in YOUR newsreader but not in mine and perhaps other people's > >as well. > > I use OE 6.0. So do you. I have done nothing to stop attachments. But they are > not there where once they were. I assume MS has done something about them at > last. > > Your warning, BTW, is only two weeks or so late. > > --------------------------------------- > >> If you are going to respond to these messages, have the decency not to > >> **include** the message in your response. You are propagating the message > >as > >> if you were infected yourself. > >> > > > >Actually, I'm not. You must open the attachments in order to propagate the > >virus, not the message that contains them. > > You posted copies of the message. That, by definition, is reproduction. > > > > >Ok. But I didn't realize this made me an indecant person! > > Maybe 'indecent' is too strong an implication. How about 'thoughtless'? And I > won't imply it - I'll say it directly - because you <didn't> think. > > --------------------------------------- > >> Thanks, > >> On behalf of everyone. > >> > > > >Sorry, I wasn't at the meeting where YOU were elected to speak for EVERYONE. > > Over the last couple of weeks there have been plenty of people replying to the > messages to whom the suggestion has been made - don't reply and we can all > ignore them. > > > --------------------------------------- > >Clearly, your system is not set up the same way mine is and so > >clearly you can't speak for everyone, so please DON'T! > > I retract that statement 'On behalf of everyone'. > > Thanks, > On behalf of everyone who does not see the attachments, and/or those who > delete these messages, and/or anyone who is inconvenienced as much by **your > response** as by the message itself. > >
Hello Scott,
I've just deleted the originals messages of these threads from my newsreader. Now you've replied to all three and I have them back again. Groan!! :-(( You say DO NOT OPEN, but there's nothing *to* open. FYI these are not viruses. They *were* originally, but the virus code has been removed which is why they are 14K instead of over 100K. The size is due to the graphic not any virus code. They are harmless now, except that they waste space and people's time. If you are going to respond to these messages, have the decency not to **include** the message in your response. You are propagating the message as if you were infected yourself. Thanks, On behalf of everyone.
Jeez Scott,
[quoted text, click to view] >> I've just deleted the originals messages of these threads from my >> newsreader. Now you've replied to all three and I have them back again. >> Groan!! :-(( > >Let me get this straight...We're all supposed to NOT reply to messages >YOU'VE removed from YOUR newsreader? I'm sorry, I didn't get that memo. Well now you know - some people delete these posts. You are ADDING to the problem not solving anything. --------------------------------------- [quoted text, click to view] >> >> You say DO NOT OPEN, but there's nothing *to* open. > >Perhaps in YOUR newsreader, but in mine these messages contain attachments, >which contain the virus! > > FYI etc, etc. > >Again, perhaps in YOUR newsreader but not in mine and perhaps other people's >as well. I use OE 6.0. So do you. I have done nothing to stop attachments. But they are not there where once they were. I assume MS has done something about them at last. Your warning, BTW, is only two weeks or so late. --------------------------------------- [quoted text, click to view] >> If you are going to respond to these messages, have the decency not to >> **include** the message in your response. You are propagating the message >as >> if you were infected yourself. >> > >Actually, I'm not. You must open the attachments in order to propagate the >virus, not the message that contains them. You posted copies of the message. That, by definition, is reproduction. [quoted text, click to view] > >Ok. But I didn't realize this made me an indecant person! Maybe 'indecent' is too strong an implication. How about 'thoughtless'? And I won't imply it - I'll say it directly - because you <didn't> think. --------------------------------------- [quoted text, click to view] >> Thanks, >> On behalf of everyone. >> > >Sorry, I wasn't at the meeting where YOU were elected to speak for EVERYONE. Over the last couple of weeks there have been plenty of people replying to the messages to whom the suggestion has been made - don't reply and we can all ignore them. --------------------------------------- [quoted text, click to view] >Clearly, your system is not set up the same way mine is and so >clearly you can't speak for everyone, so please DON'T! I retract that statement 'On behalf of everyone'. Thanks, On behalf of everyone who does not see the attachments, and/or those who delete these messages, and/or anyone who is inconvenienced as much by **your response** as by the message itself.
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
October 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
March 2008
April 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |