| Groups | Blog | Home |
vb.net : the beginning of the end for VB?
http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005873
it looks to me like M$ is not supporting VB anymore
MS is not dropping VB. You're inappropriately extrapolating an article
about coding for embedded devices to the entire universe. Robin S. -------------------------------------- [quoted text, click to view] "Larry Linson" <larrylinsonjr@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1171433056.623323.277660@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... > http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005873 > > it looks to me like M$ is not supporting VB anymore >
eat a dick whore
I WILL NOT SURRENDER ANOTHER INCH TO CDULL [quoted text, click to view] On Feb 13, 10:23 pm, "RobinS" <Rob...@NoSpam.yah.none> wrote: > MS is not dropping VB. You're inappropriately extrapolating an article > about coding for embedded devices to the entire universe. > > Robin S. > --------------------------------------"Larry Linson" <larrylinso...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1171433056.623323.277660@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... > > > > >http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005873 > > > it looks to me like M$ is not supporting VB anymore- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
C# does not exist; fuck C#
VB is the language of choice this is the last straw; time for rioting in the streets. BRING BACK VB OR EAT FIRE AND DEATH, MS [quoted text, click to view] On Feb 13, 10:22 pm, "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <M...@posseth.com> wrote: > Huh !! ..... has MS ever suported embedded systems with VB ? > > I do not think so thus what is your point ? > > Embedded systems were programmed in C like syntax so it is not more as > logical to release a C# version to replace this > > regards > > Michel > > "Larry Linson" <larrylinso...@hotmail.com> schreef in berichtnews:1171433056.623323.277660@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... > > > > >http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005873 > > > it looks to me like M$ is not supporting VB anymore- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
C# DOES NOT EXIST
WHAT USED TO BE C SHOULD GO INTO THE WORLDS MOST POPULAR LANGUAGE VB6 [quoted text, click to view] On Feb 13, 10:22 pm, "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <M...@posseth.com> wrote: > Huh !! ..... has MS ever suported embedded systems with VB ? > > I do not think so thus what is your point ? > > Embedded systems were programmed in C like syntax so it is not more as > logical to release a C# version to replace this > > regards > > Michel > > "Larry Linson" <larrylinso...@hotmail.com> schreef in berichtnews:1171433056.623323.277660@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... > > > > >http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005873 > > > it looks to me like M$ is not supporting VB anymore- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Huh !! ..... has MS ever suported embedded systems with VB ? I do not think so thus what is your point ? Embedded systems were programmed in C like syntax so it is not more as logical to release a C# version to replace this regards Michel "Larry Linson" <larrylinsonjr@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht news:1171433056.623323.277660@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... [quoted text, click to view] > http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005873 > > it looks to me like M$ is not supporting VB anymore >
Michel,
"Michel Posseth [MCP]" <MSDN@posseth.com> schrieb: [quoted text, click to view] > Huh !! ..... has MS ever suported embedded systems with VB ? > > I do not think so thus what is your point ? > > Embedded systems were programmed in C like syntax so it is not more as > logical to release a C# version to replace this Well, they were developed using C because of its runtime characteristics, but with C# and VB both running on the same CLR I don't see any reason for not supporting VB. -- M S Herfried K. Wagner M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>
Herfried , Only thing i can think of is target audience ,,,,, same is seen by the robotic examples lots of C# examples and only a few VB examples Technicly speaking they should both be capable to do the same ( C# , VB ) however my thought is that these MS teams are targeting there products to the broadest public , so maybe a VB version will be there in a few months / years or even never . michel "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.at> schreef in bericht news:eCwPkREUHHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... [quoted text, click to view] > Michel, > > "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <MSDN@posseth.com> schrieb: >> Huh !! ..... has MS ever suported embedded systems with VB ? >> >> I do not think so thus what is your point ? >> >> Embedded systems were programmed in C like syntax so it is not more as >> logical to release a C# version to replace this > > Well, they were developed using C because of its runtime characteristics, > but with C# and VB both running on the same CLR I don't see any reason for > not supporting VB. > > -- > M S Herfried K. Wagner > M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> > V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>
Herfried,
I thought to have seen that you have taken an action somewhere else. However in this case I would like it more as there was more effort taken in DirectX for VB.Net. However I agree with your action of course. Cor "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-here@gmx.at> schreef in bericht news:eCwPkREUHHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... [quoted text, click to view] > Michel, > > "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <MSDN@posseth.com> schrieb: >> Huh !! ..... has MS ever suported embedded systems with VB ? >> >> I do not think so thus what is your point ? >> >> Embedded systems were programmed in C like syntax so it is not more as >> logical to release a C# version to replace this > > Well, they were developed using C because of its runtime characteristics, > but with C# and VB both running on the same CLR I don't see any reason for > not supporting VB. > > -- > M S Herfried K. Wagner > M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> > V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>
Michael
they don't provide VB examples for ANYTHING anymore just a bunch of C dorks and Excel dorks. they don't understand the VB MARKET. [quoted text, click to view] On Feb 14, 10:37 pm, "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <M...@posseth.com> wrote: > Herfried , > > Only thing i can think of is target audience ,,,,, same is seen by the > robotic examples lots of C# examples and only a few VB examples > > Technicly speaking they should both be capable to do the same ( C# , VB ) > however my thought is that these MS teams are targeting there products to > the broadest public , so maybe a VB version will be there in a few months / > years or even never . > > michel > > "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me-h...@gmx.at> schreef in berichtnews:eCwPkREUHHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > > > > > Michel, > > > "Michel Posseth [MCP]" <M...@posseth.com> schrieb: > >> Huh !! ..... has MS ever suported embedded systems with VB ? > > >> I do not think so thus what is your point ? > > >> Embedded systems were programmed in C like syntax so it is not more as > >> logical to release a C# version to replace this > > > Well, they were developed using C because of its runtime characteristics, > > but with C# and VB both running on the same CLR I don't see any reason for > > not supporting VB. > > > -- > > M S Herfried K. Wagner > > M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> > > V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Herfried
thank you, it is nice to find other people who stick up for VB -Aaron On Feb 15, 4:41 am, "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me- [quoted text, click to view] h...@gmx.at> wrote: > Cor, > > "Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstn...@planet.nl> schrieb: > > > I thought to have seen that you have taken an action somewhere else. > > :-) > > > However in this case I would like it more as there was more effort taken > > in DirectX for VB.Net. > > I fully agree. I'd like to see VB support everywhere where VB is (from a > technical standpoint) as appropriate as C#. > > -- > M S Herfried K. Wagner > M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> > V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>
"Michel Posseth [MCP]" <MSDN@posseth.com> schrieb:
[quoted text, click to view] > Only thing i can think of is target audience ,,,,, same is seen by the > robotic examples lots of C# examples and only a few VB examples Although this is not the professional market, I remember VB6 being very popular for Lego Mindstorm robot programming. [quoted text, click to view] > Technicly speaking they should both be capable to do the same ( C# , VB ) > however my thought is that these MS teams are targeting there products to > the broadest public , so maybe a VB version will be there in a few months > / years or even never . I hope that there will be VB versions made available too. In most cases this should not take such a huge effort. -- M S Herfried K. Wagner M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>
Cor,
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> schrieb: [quoted text, click to view] > I thought to have seen that you have taken an action somewhere else. :-) [quoted text, click to view] > However in this case I would like it more as there was more effort taken > in DirectX for VB.Net. I fully agree. I'd like to see VB support everywhere where VB is (from a technical standpoint) as appropriate as C#. -- M S Herfried K. Wagner M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>
I'm not going to be so soft as 'Id like to see'
I DEMAND VB ON AN EQUAL FOOTING WITH CSHARP. CSHARP DID NOT EXIST 5 YEARS AGO. I DONT CARE IF IT IS MORE POPULAR, I DO NOT RECOGNIZE C# AS AN OPTION SO MS CAN BURN IN HELL UNTIL THEY PUT VB ON AN EQUAL FOOTING. I DEMAND AN EQUAL FOOTING FOR VB OR SHIT, IF YOUR STUPID COMPANY CAN'T AFFORD TO PUT VB AND C# ON THE SAME FOOTING THEN _DISCONTINUE_ CSHARP On Feb 15, 4:41 am, "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me- [quoted text, click to view] h...@gmx.at> wrote: > Cor, > > "Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstn...@planet.nl> schrieb: > > > I thought to have seen that you have taken an action somewhere else. > > :-) > > > However in this case I would like it more as there was more effort taken > > in DirectX for VB.Net. > > I fully agree. I'd like to see VB support everywhere where VB is (from a > technical standpoint) as appropriate as C#. > > -- > M S Herfried K. Wagner > M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> > V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>
I strongly applaud your courage
please keep up the good work; spreading the good word of VB6 dotnet is a half-baked solution at best; it doesn't run SQL jobs; you can't cut and paste .NET code in Excel ..NET is irrelevent [quoted text, click to view] On Feb 16, 5:44 pm, "Larry Linson" <larrylinso...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I'm not going to be so soft as 'Id like to see' > > I DEMAND VB ON AN EQUAL FOOTING WITH CSHARP. > > CSHARP DID NOT EXIST 5 YEARS AGO. > I DONT CARE IF IT IS MORE POPULAR, I DO NOT RECOGNIZE C# AS AN OPTION > SO MS CAN BURN IN HELL UNTIL THEY PUT VB ON AN EQUAL FOOTING. > > I DEMAND AN EQUAL FOOTING FOR VB > OR SHIT, IF YOUR STUPID COMPANY CAN'T AFFORD TO PUT VB AND C# ON THE > SAME FOOTING THEN _DISCONTINUE_ CSHARP > > On Feb 15, 4:41 am, "Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hirf-spam-me- > > > > h...@gmx.at> wrote: > > Cor, > > > "Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstn...@planet.nl> schrieb: > > > > I thought to have seen that you have taken an action somewhere else. > > > :-) > > > > However in this case I would like it more as there was more effort taken > > > in DirectX for VB.Net. > > > I fully agree. I'd like to see VB support everywhere where VB is (from a > > technical standpoint) as appropriate as C#. > > > -- > > M S Herfried K. Wagner > > M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/> > > V B <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |