|
|
You're in the
dotnet security
group:Help me to understand ??
dotnet security:
I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this study I am face to different example which connect to database within a ServicedComponent.. My question is what is the adavantang of using this ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, Application messaging, database transaction....? In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows Service ? regards
If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would say very
little. The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control who can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is more or less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. /Claus [quoted text, click to view] "serge calderara" wrote:
> Dear all, > > I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this study I am > face to different example which connect to database within a > ServicedComponent.. > > My question is what is the adavantang of using this ServicedComponent > features if no interest on Object pooling, Application messaging, database > transaction....? > > In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows Service ? > > regards
Could Windows service can do the same as well ?
[quoted text, click to view] "Claus Konrad" wrote:
> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would say very > little. > The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control who > can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is more or > less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. > > /Claus > > "serge calderara" wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this study I am > > face to different example which connect to database within a > > ServicedComponent.. > > > > My question is what is the adavantang of using this ServicedComponent > > features if no interest on Object pooling, Application messaging, database > > transaction....? > > > > In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows Service ? > > > > regards
What is this AzMan about ?
A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? [quoted text, click to view] "Dominick Baier" wrote:
> no - this is COM+ specific. > > But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned before) > > Have a look at this: > > http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx > > --- > Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor > http://www.leastprivilege.com > > > Could Windows service can do the same as well ? > > > > "Claus Konrad" wrote: > > > >> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would > >> say very > >> little. > >> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control > >> who > >> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is > >> more or > >> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. > >> /Claus > >> > >> "serge calderara" wrote: > >> > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this > >>> study I am face to different example which connect to database > >>> within a ServicedComponent.. > >>> > >>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this > >>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, > >>> Application messaging, database transaction....? > >>> > >>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows > >>> Service ? > >>> > >>> regards > >>> serge > >
no - this is COM+ specific.
But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned before) Have a look at this: http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx --- Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor http://www.leastprivilege.com [quoted text, click to view] > Could Windows service can do the same as well ? > > "Claus Konrad" wrote: > >> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I would >> say very >> little. >> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to control >> who >> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is >> more or >> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. >> /Claus >> >> "serge calderara" wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this >>> study I am face to different example which connect to database >>> within a ServicedComponent.. >>> >>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this >>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, >>> Application messaging, database transaction....? >>> >>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows >>> Service ? >>> >>> regards >>> serg
well "handmade" by Microsoft ;)
--- Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor http://www.leastprivilege.com [quoted text, click to view] > What is this AzMan about ? > A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? > "Dominick Baier" wrote: > >> no - this is COM+ specific. >> >> But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned >> before) >> >> Have a look at this: >> >> http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx >> >> --- >> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor >> http://www.leastprivilege.com >>> Could Windows service can do the same as well ? >>> >>> "Claus Konrad" wrote: >>> >>>> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I >>>> would >>>> say very >>>> little. >>>> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to >>>> control >>>> who >>>> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is >>>> more or >>>> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. >>>> /Claus >>>> "serge calderara" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this >>>>> study I am face to different example which connect to database >>>>> within a ServicedComponent.. >>>>> >>>>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this >>>>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, >>>>> Application messaging, database transaction....? >>>>> >>>>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows >>>>> Service ? >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> serg
Ha oki...
What does it offer more than exisiting stuff ? [quoted text, click to view] "Dominick Baier" wrote:
> well "handmade" by Microsoft ;) > > --- > Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor > http://www.leastprivilege.com > > > What is this AzMan about ? > > A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? > > "Dominick Baier" wrote: > > > >> no - this is COM+ specific. > >> > >> But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as metioned > >> before) > >> > >> Have a look at this: > >> > >> http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx > >> > >> --- > >> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor > >> http://www.leastprivilege.com > >>> Could Windows service can do the same as well ? > >>> > >>> "Claus Konrad" wrote: > >>> > >>>> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I > >>>> would > >>>> say very > >>>> little. > >>>> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to > >>>> control > >>>> who > >>>> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It is > >>>> more or > >>>> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. > >>>> /Claus > >>>> "serge calderara" wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Dear all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this > >>>>> study I am face to different example which connect to database > >>>>> within a ServicedComponent.. > >>>>> > >>>>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this > >>>>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, > >>>>> Application messaging, database transaction....? > >>>>> > >>>>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows > >>>>> Service ? > >>>>> > >>>>> regards > >>>>> serge > >
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnnetserv/html/AzManApps.asp --- Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor http://www.leastprivilege.com [quoted text, click to view] > Ha oki... > What does it offer more than exisiting stuff ? > "Dominick Baier" wrote: > >> well "handmade" by Microsoft ;) >> >> --- >> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor >> http://www.leastprivilege.com >>> What is this AzMan about ? >>> A hand made class on top of satandard .Net pincipal ?? >>> "Dominick Baier" wrote: >>>> no - this is COM+ specific. >>>> >>>> But you can implement the same functionality using AzMan (as >>>> metioned before) >>>> >>>> Have a look at this: >>>> >>>> http://www.leastprivilege.com/AnotherWayOfIntegratingAzMan.aspx >>>> >>>> --- >>>> Dominick Baier, DevelopMentor >>>> http://www.leastprivilege.com >>>>> Could Windows service can do the same as well ? >>>>> >>>>> "Claus Konrad" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> If you have no interest in any of the mentioned advantages - I >>>>>> would >>>>>> say very >>>>>> little. >>>>>> The only thing I can think of is that you have the ability to >>>>>> control >>>>>> who >>>>>> can make use of your components via the "Component Security". It >>>>>> is >>>>>> more or >>>>>> less the same level of granilarity found in the Azman framework. >>>>>> /Claus >>>>>> "serge calderara" wrote: >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I ma studying security stuff to prepare my next exam and in this >>>>>>> study I am face to different example which connect to database >>>>>>> within a ServicedComponent.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My question is what is the adavantang of using this >>>>>>> ServicedComponent features if no interest on Object pooling, >>>>>>> Application messaging, database transaction....? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In other words any benefits of that compare to simple Windows >>>>>>> Service ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards >>>>>>> serg
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |