"Chris Smith" <user@email.com> wrote in message
news:e9bCK1tJEHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I bet this question has been asked quite a bit, but if someone can point
me
> in the right direction, I would be very grateful.
>
> I would like to write a assembly (dll) that one of the functions will act
as
> a task router. This router will take different objects of many types, and
> pass that object to the correct webservice for handling. Seems that doing
> this creates quite a bit of serialization issues, especially when the
> webservice returns a modified object to the task router for forwarding to
> the client.
>
> Example:
>
> Client App -> Task Router -> Web Service (Altered object)
> Web Service -> Task Router -> Client App
>
> How can I make the task router not care about class types. I really don't
> want to code every possible class type into the router as new apps will
also
> use this. Is there a method for doing what I am trying, seems there should
> be a way to avoid the constant updating and maintenance.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>

"AA" <aa@personal.net.py> wrote in message
news:%235W$eOuJEHA.3216@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> My opinion..
>
> Use reflection for dynamic load of classes and
serialization/deserialization
>
>
> AA
>
>
> "Chris Smith" <user@email.com> wrote in message
> news:e9bCK1tJEHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > I bet this question has been asked quite a bit, but if someone can point
> me
> > in the right direction, I would be very grateful.
> >
> > I would like to write a assembly (dll) that one of the functions will
act
> as
> > a task router. This router will take different objects of many types,
and
> > pass that object to the correct webservice for handling. Seems that
doing
> > this creates quite a bit of serialization issues, especially when the
> > webservice returns a modified object to the task router for forwarding
to
> > the client.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > Client App -> Task Router -> Web Service (Altered object)
> > Web Service -> Task Router -> Client App
> >
> > How can I make the task router not care about class types. I really
don't
> > want to code every possible class type into the router as new apps will
> also
> > use this. Is there a method for doing what I am trying, seems there
should
> > be a way to avoid the constant updating and maintenance.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
>
>