A set of xsd files has been working fine for us at this site, but now it gives *intermittent* errors for someone at a different cite (who is consuming the code we are producing). Most of the time it works fine. Occasionally it gives an error in the schema compiler: "System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaException: Wildcard '##other' allows element 'Page', and causes the content model to become ambiguous. A content model must be formed such that during validation of an element information item sequence, the particle contained directly, indirectly or implicitly therein with which to attempt to validate each item in the sequence in turn can be uniquely determined without examining the content or attributes of that item, and without any information about the items in the remainder of the sequence. at System.Xml.Schema.BaseProcessor.SendValidationEvent(XmlSchemaException e, XmlSeverityType severity) at System.Xml.Schema.BaseProcessor.SendValidationEvent(String code, String msg1, String msg2, XmlSchemaObject source) at System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.CompileComplexContent(XmlSchemaComplexType complexType) at System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.CompileComplexType(XmlSchemaComplexType complexType) at System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.Compile() at System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.Execute(XmlSchema schema, SchemaInfo schemaInfo, Boolean compileContentModel) at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchema.CompileSchema(XmlSchemaCollection xsc, XmlResolver resolver, SchemaInfo schemaInfo, String ns, ValidationEventHandler validationEventHandler, XmlNameTable nameTable, Boolean CompileContentModel) at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaCollection.Add(String ns, SchemaInfo schemaInfo, XmlSchema schema, Boolean compile, XmlResolver resolver) at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaCollection.Add(String ns, XmlRea""der reader, XmlResolver resolver) at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaCollection.Add(String ns, String uri) A search on Google didn't find anything other than people debugging actual errors in their schemas. Please help ASAP.
[quoted text, click to view] "JMD" <11lrhap02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:1176841697.969978.177110@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >A set of xsd files has been working fine for us at this site, but now > it gives *intermittent* errors for someone at a different cite (who is > consuming the code we are producing). Most of the time it works > fine. Occasionally it gives an error in the schema compiler: > > > "System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaException: Wildcard '##other' allows > element 'Page', and causes the content model to become ambiguous. A > content model must be formed such that during validation of an element > information item sequence, the particle contained directly, indirectly > or implicitly therein with which to attempt to validate each item in > the sequence in turn can be uniquely determined without examining the > content or attributes of that item, and without any information about > the items in the remainder of the sequence. > at > System.Xml.Schema.BaseProcessor.SendValidationEvent(XmlSchemaException > e, XmlSeverityType severity) > at System.Xml.Schema.BaseProcessor.SendValidationEvent(String code, > String msg1, String msg2, XmlSchemaObject source) > at > System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.CompileComplexContent(XmlSchemaComplexType > complexType) > at > System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.CompileComplexType(XmlSchemaComplexType > complexType) > at System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.Compile() > at System.Xml.Schema.SchemaCollectionCompiler.Execute(XmlSchema > schema, SchemaInfo schemaInfo, Boolean compileContentModel) > at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchema.CompileSchema(XmlSchemaCollection > xsc, XmlResolver resolver, SchemaInfo schemaInfo, String ns, > ValidationEventHandler validationEventHandler, XmlNameTable nameTable, > Boolean CompileContentModel) > at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaCollection.Add(String ns, SchemaInfo > schemaInfo, XmlSchema schema, Boolean compile, XmlResolver resolver) > at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaCollection.Add(String ns, XmlRea""der > reader, XmlResolver resolver) > at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaCollection.Add(String ns, String uri) > > > > A search on Google didn't find anything other than people debugging > actual errors in their schemas. Please help ASAP.
Actually, this sounds like an actual error in your schema, but perhaps one which is only occasionally detected by .NET. I suggest you take a look at that portion of your schema and attempt to create ambiguous documents. If you succeed, then .NET is telling you the truth about your schema (though perhaps it should tell you all of the time, and not just sometimes). Also, if it's dependent on the XML being validated, then perhaps you should try capturing the XML that .NET is complaining about. -- John Saunders [MVP]
[quoted text, click to view] John Saunders [MVP] wrote: > Actually, this sounds like an actual error in your schema, but perhaps one > which is only occasionally detected by .NET.
I've also tried getting a second opinion on the schema validation. There are no problems reported with xsdvalid, nor with Altova, validating the same XML file against the schema. [quoted text, click to view] > I suggest you take a look at that portion of your schema and attempt to > create ambiguous documents. If you succeed, then .NET is telling you the > truth about your schema (though perhaps it should tell you all of the time, > and not just sometimes).
The error message does not make sense. 'Page' is a local element, one of several children. The ##other will only accept additional elements that are in a different namespace, and there is no default namespace specified in the document. So an unqualified name is unambiguously the defined child element. [quoted text, click to view] > Also, if it's dependent on the XML being validated, then perhaps you should > try capturing the XML that .NET is complaining about.
The same XML file will work most of the time and not work on occasion. The error trace indicates that the exception takes place when adding the schema to the schemalist, which is done before the actual XML file of interest is read.
[quoted text, click to view] "JMD" <11lrhap02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:1176906421.773156.248410@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > > John Saunders [MVP] wrote: > >> Actually, this sounds like an actual error in your schema, but perhaps >> one >> which is only occasionally detected by .NET. > > I've also tried getting a second opinion on the schema validation. > There are no problems reported with xsdvalid, nor with Altova, > validating the same XML file against the schema. > >> I suggest you take a look at that portion of your schema and attempt to >> create ambiguous documents. If you succeed, then .NET is telling you the >> truth about your schema (though perhaps it should tell you all of the >> time, >> and not just sometimes). > > The error message does not make sense. 'Page' is a local element, one > of several children. The ##other will only accept additional elements > that are in a different namespace, and there is no default namespace > specified in the document. So an unqualified name is unambiguously > the defined child element. > >> Also, if it's dependent on the XML being validated, then perhaps you >> should >> try capturing the XML that .NET is complaining about. > > The same XML file will work most of the time and not work on > occasion. The error trace indicates that the exception takes place > when adding the schema to the schemalist, which is done before the > actual XML file of interest is read.
Ok, sorry, I misread your post. I thought this was a validation problem. In fact, if you can reproduce it simply by adding the schema to the list, then this has nothing to do with validation. Can you post details of a reproducer that just causes the error on loading the schema? I know it doesn't happen all the time, but could you create an example and run it repeatedly or something like that? Also, please post the code and the schema and include specifics of which Visual Studio version you're using, OS version, service packs, etc? -- John Saunders [MVP]
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|