I think web services would be one of the few choices. If your systems could
potentially be "anything" (ie. Linux, window etc...) then you need some form
overhead just to transport data between process boundaries.
There will be overhead but not as much as you would think, and it will work.
platform/technology specific choices (eg. remoting for .Net, sockets, other
forms of RPC for each platform/technology). IMHO, you can save yourself some
- Paul Glavich.
"Johann Blake" <johannblake@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d85eb46.0403260707.42daef08@posting.google.com...
> I have an XML web service that can be customized by customers. The
> goal is this...
>
> A process must run *somewhere* that acts as an interface between the
> web service and some foreign system. Whatever that foreign system is
> doesn't matter. It can be anything. The process could run on the same
> server where the web service is located or it could be located
> somewhere on the Internet including the customer's own machine.
>
> The process must always be running. The process must implement an
> interface that is defined by us (the developers of the web service).
> This is because various customers around the world will implement the
> interface differently, but they must all use the same interface to
> interact with the web service.
>
> So these processes might come from us or they might come from
> customers. They might be installed locally or they might be running on
> a remote machine on the Internet.
>
> The web service can call the process or the process can call the web
> service. Either end can initiate the communication.
>
> So the question is, what would be the best solution to implement this
> scenario? The best I can come up with is to have the processes
> designed as a Windows service. The web service would communicate with
> the Windows service via Remoting. But this only works for .NET. Some
> customers might be using Linux for all I know and for all I care.
>
> So if Remoting is thrown out, that only leaves an XML web service
> interface or possibly a TCP socket interface. TCP sockets however are
> ugly since they require proprietary messaging schemes built into them.
>
> The problem with XML web services is that if the processes run on the
> same machine as the web service, you are probably looking at a large
> overhead just to transport data between process boundaries.
>
> Any other suggestions?
>
>
> Thanks for your insight,
> Johann Blake
>
> CloserWorlds
>
www.closerworlds.com >
> GPS tracking for vehicle, people, cell phones over GSM, GPRS. Uses an
> XML web service, supports various mapping software including MapPoint
> and OziExplorer, is hardware independent, supports data in multiple
> languages and can be adapted by programmers. Uses SQL Server. Built
> entirely in C#.