> Obfuscators don't make it "near impossible to disassemble", they just make
it
> hard to read the disassembled IL. There's nothing stopping someone from
> disassembling a native binary as well; it's just harder to map optimized
> native code to a specific programming language. The same can be done with
> assemblies with a product called Salamander .NET Protector [1] which
converts
> assemblies from IL to native code; making it as hard to disassemble as
> non-managed binaries.
>
> I'm in no way affiliated with RemoteSoft.
>
> [1] http://www.remotesoft.com/salamander/protector.html
> --
> http://www.peterRitchie.com/
>
>
> "CT" wrote:
>
> > Well, you don't say if it's a Web application, in which situation you're
> > fairly safe from reverse-engineering. Other issues are related to Web
app
> > security though. If you're releasing a Windows or Console app, then yes
it
> > can be disassembled using various tools. You might want to look into
> > obfuscation, the process of making disassembling near impossible then.
> >
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/jul04/07-19preemptivesolutionpr.mspx
> >
> > --
> > Carsten Thomsen
> > Communities - http://community.integratedsolutions.dk
> > ---------
> > Voodoo Programming: Things programmers do that they know shouldn't work
but
> > they try anyway, and which sometimes actually work, such as recompiling
> > everything. (Karl Lehenbauer)
> > ---------
> > "zeeway" <zeeway@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:O9%23OQSCkGHA.4276@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> > > hi,every one!
> > > I have an urgent question. My codes need to be published now,but I
learn
> > > programs produced with .net are very easy to be reverse-engineered.
Could
> > > anyone give me some sugguestions to protect my c# codes?
> > >
> > >
> > > Crespo
> > >
> > > 2006-06-15
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >

> Hello zeeway,
>
> I think you should not bother about it if you are not working for the
military
> or develop some revolutional algorighms
> Notwithstanding the fact that you code may be shown it doesn't meen that
> it will be understanded by others.
> Another fact is that if you provide license for you program you can
specify
> that scrutinizing the binaries in prohibited
>
> Jon wrote a good article, and I completely argee with his point, related
> to the protecting managed code, see it there
http://www.yoda.arachsys.com/csharp/obfuscation.html
>
>
> z> hi,every one!
> z> I have an urgent question. My codes need to be published now,but I
> z> learn
> z> programs produced with .net are very easy to be reverse-engineered.
> z> Could
> z> anyone give me some sugguestions to protect my c# codes?
> z>
> z> Crespo
> z>
> z> 2006-06-15
> z>
> ---
> WBR,
> Michael Nemtsev :: blog: http://spaces.msn.com/laflour
>
> "At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do
not
> cease to be insipid." (c) Friedrich Nietzsche
>
>