I strongly recommend not to go with 1&1. I tried them, and was very
disappointed with the service, technical support, etc. There were
several bugs (my password was truncated to 8 chars without warning,
ASP.NET did not work at all, I could not point my domain to there DNS
servers, etc.). After two phone calls I finally had a 'Hello World'
page going. When I uploaded my website, I found out that they use
'Code Access Security' to isolate web applications. Trust level is set
to a minimum, which means no unmanaged code, no COM, no ADO, etc.
Pretty ridicules for a service provider to turn off services many
customers will need. I guess if they use CAS instead of process
isolation, they save a little memory so they can put more websites on
a single machine. Didn't even get my money back so I wasted around
$60. Anyway, don't go with 1&1. They suck big time.
If you want to play, try:
http://www.brinkster.com/ If you need a cheap host (starting at $5/month), try:
http://www.webhost4life.com/ Marius
[quoted text, click to view] "newbie" <not@important.com> wrote in message news:<OuOjHemoEHA.2684@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>...
> I am just learning .NET, and would like to get a hosting account to "play".
> I'm not very concerned if the site goes down occasionally, etc. as it will
> be used strictly for the purpose of learning, and for that reason price is a
> large concern.
>
> That being said, I've been looking at 1and1.com, as it seems to have very
> attractive deals for Windows hosting. The question I have is that I've
> noticed some web hosts say "compatable with Visual Studio" or "supports
> code-behind", others (including 1and1.com) don't mention it. As long as the
> server is Windows 2003, with framework 1.1, shouldn't the Studio work on the
> site?
>
> Also, does anyone have any experience with .NET development on that host?
>
In message <412e386.0409291000.62e01e07@posting.google.com>, Marius
Greuel <mariusgreuel@msn.com> writes
[quoted text, click to view] >I strongly recommend not to go with 1&1. I tried them, and was very
>disappointed with the service, technical support, etc. There were
>several bugs (my password was truncated to 8 chars without warning,
>ASP.NET did not work at all, I could not point my domain to there DNS
>servers, etc.). After two phone calls I finally had a 'Hello World'
>page going. When I uploaded my website, I found out that they use
>'Code Access Security' to isolate web applications. Trust level is set
>to a minimum, which means no unmanaged code, no COM, no ADO, etc.
>Pretty ridicules for a service provider to turn off services many
>customers will need. I guess if they use CAS instead of process
>isolation, they save a little memory so they can put more websites on
>a single machine. Didn't even get my money back so I wasted around
>$60. Anyway, don't go with 1&1. They suck big time.
<Snip...>
I'm sorry to here you say that about 1&1.
I have 4 web sites active through them and have not had any problems
what so ever.
--
Andrew D. Newbould E-Mail: newsgroups@NOSPAMzadsoft.com