no problemo. sorry for the late response, i only occasionaly monitor this
"SherryM" <SherryM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:CA76C623-5E6E-431A-8F5B-1D5C652A4503@microsoft.com...
>I rewrote the piece of code doing an array of strings to use a map instead.
> This fixed my problem.
> I had another dll that wouldn't register and your suggestion about looking
> at the dependencies helped me find the problem with that one - I was
> missing
> MFC71.dll.
>
> Thanks very much for the help,
> Sherry
>
> "SherryM" wrote:
>
>> Hello Alvin,
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I recompiled it in debug mode and tried to
>> install the control in the ActiveX test container. It failed to install
>> because it got an E_OUTOFMEMORY creating an instance of a string class.
>> This
>> is a wrapper class that we wrote around stdstring to include format and
>> some
>> other functions that weren't native to it.
>> I didn't change any of the compile flags when I converted it. Is there
>> something I can do in the compile flags to correct this condition? Or do
>> I
>> have to rewrite my code?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sherry
>>
>> "Alvin Bruney [MVP - ASP.NET]" wrote:
>>
>> > Is there a hresult error code? alternatively, you can look in the
>> > eventwr to
>> > see if it is a permissions problem.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Alvin Bruney - ASP.NET MVP
>> >
>> > [Shameless Author Plug]
>> > The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
>> > Now available @
www.lulu.com/owc, Amazon.com etc
>> > "SherryM" <SherryM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> > news:38BDBC32-A626-4C59-B6FB-149DF0BA9536@microsoft.com...
>> > >I have an ATL COM object compiled with VC 6.0 that needs to be
>> > >compiled in
>> > > Visual Studio .Net 2003. I got the project converted, compiled and
>> > > linked
>> > > without errors. It registers correctly but it will not instatiate as
>> > > an
>> > > ActiveX control in my classic ASP pages. I get the "ActiveX
>> > > component
>> > > can't
>> > > create object" message.
>> > > What am I doing wrong?
>> > > Thanks,
>> >
>> >
>> >