I am having trouble with a really simple problem! haha. How do you
display that data from on xml file. Here is my xml file called
"test.xml"

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<test>
<person>
<name>Jason</name>
<color>blue</color>
<number>16</number>
</person>
<person>
<name>Josh</name>
<color>red</color>
<number>10</number>
</person>
<person>
<name>Justin</name>
<color>blue</color>
<number>7</number>
</person>
</test>


Now, what I want to do is to have it display all the elements per
<person>. For example, I want an output to say be something to the
extent of....

Jason
blue
16

Josh
red
10

Justin
blue
7

So here is the ASP I have set up...but it doesnt work. I am having
problems with the syntax I think?


' Sets up the DOM

Dim xdoc
Set xdoc=Server.CreateObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM")
xdoc.async=false
xdoc.load("c:\test.xml")

if xdoc.parseError.errorcode<>0 then
response.write("there was obviously an error")
else
response.write("Things worked <br><br>")
end if


Set Root = xdoc.documentElement
Set NodeList = Root.getElementsByTagName("person")
For Each Elem In NodeList
response.write(Elem.firstChild.firstchild.nodeValue)
Next

============================

that code wont error, but it only shows the firstchild. So I tired
Elem.firstChild.childNodes(1).nodeValue right after it and it broke
"Object requried".

WTf?

help?
%>

First off - THANKS :)

However...while it didnt error, the page produced nothing. So, using
the said xml file and now this code :

<%
' Sets up the DOM

Dim xdoc
Set xdoc=Server.CreateObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM")
xdoc.async=false
xdoc.load("c:\test.xml")

if xdoc.parseError.errorcode<>0 then
response.write "there was obviously an error"
else
response.write "Things worked <br><br>"
end if

For Each elemPerson in xdoc.SelectNodes("/root/person")
For Each elem in elemPerson.SelectNodes("*")
Response.Write elem.tagName & ": " & elem.Text & "<br />"
Next
Next
%>

========================================

All I get is a blank page that says "Things worked" Also, I should
mention that im not using ASP.NET...just plain old-school ASP. So, im
not sure if thats why its not working?

so...any ideas?

[quoted text, click to view]

Yes you are.

[quoted text, click to view]

Use MSXML2.DOMDocument.3.0, the ProgID above it ambiguous it's likely to
return a DOM document version 3 but it may not. Also this version specific
ProgID tightens up the XML syntax parsing a little.

[quoted text, click to view]

Parentheses should not be used here use:-

xdoc.load "c:\test.xml"

[quoted text, click to view]

Parentheses in response.writes not needed.

[quoted text, click to view]

The following IMO would be better although in this case the result is the
same:-

Set NodeList = xdoc.SelectNodes("/root/person")

[quoted text, click to view]

Each Elem will be a person node. The firstChild of a person element node is
a name element node. The firstChild of a name element node is a text node.
Hence the above code writes out the content of the name node of each person
node, other nodes in the person is ignored.

[quoted text, click to view]

Ditching the NodeList variable we can get to this:-

For Each elemPerson in xdoc.SelectNodes("/root/person")
For Each elem in elemPerson.SelectNodes("*")
Response.Write elem.tagName & ": " elem.Text & "<br />"
Next
Next

Note the Text property of an element returns all the inner text of an
element. This saves you having to access the internal text node.

wrote on 28 feb 2007 in microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.general:

[quoted text, click to view]

[please always quote on usenet]

--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.

[quoted text, click to view]

Oops didn't read your XML properly the root node is called 'test' in you
xml:-

For Each elemPerson in xdoc.SelectNodes("/test/person")


[quoted text, click to view]

Ah, it's fun to quickly realize why I stay out of this group for months at a
time. Too much effort spent on correcting etiquette without adding any
substance to the conversation.




[quoted text, click to view]

[quoted text, click to view]

Indeed, but 99.99% comes from a single source, and thus it is relatively
easily ignored (as well it should be)... once you get past the irritation
factor.


-Mark


[quoted text, click to view]