"deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1182877319.863709.128090@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
> loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
> client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
> and print them on the browser?
>
> (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the server...while
> it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
> the program that is running over at the server)
>
> --deostroll
>

"Jon Paal [MSMD]" <Jon nospam Paal @ everywhere dot com> wrote in message
news:1382oetmd5ubica@corp.supernews.com...
> To achieve what I think you are wanting , use response.flush to show
interim values while the asp page is running.
>
>

> "deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182877319.863709.128090@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
> > loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
> > client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
> > and print them on the browser?
> >
> > (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the server...while
> > it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
> > the program that is running over at the server)
> >
> > --deostroll
> >
>
>

"Anthony Jones" <Ant@yadayadayada.com> wrote in message news:OyrJ28DuHHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "Jon Paal [MSMD]" <Jon nospam Paal @ everywhere dot com> wrote in message
> news:1382oetmd5ubica@corp.supernews.com...
>> To achieve what I think you are wanting , use response.flush to show
> interim values while the asp page is running.
>>
>>
>
> That'll send content to the client but the component on the client end needs
> to be able to deliver that content via an event before the response is
> complete.
>
> The only component that can do that WinHTTP. I've never wired up it's
> events in script to see if that can be done.
>
>> "deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1182877319.863709.128090@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>> > Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
>> > loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
>> > client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
>> > and print them on the browser?
>> >
>> > (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the server...while
>> > it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
>> > the program that is running over at the server)
>> >
>> > --deostroll
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

> Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
> loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
> client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
> and print them on the browser?
>
> (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the server...while
> it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
> the program that is running over at the server)
>
> --deostroll
>

"Anthony Jones" <Ant@yadayadayada.com> wrote in message news:ueNSFqVuHHA.3796@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
> "Jon Paal [MSMD]" <Jon nospam Paal @ everywhere dot com> wrote in message
> news:1384qn73f42p7fd@corp.supernews.com...
>> You can't check the progress of an ASP script from the client side.
>>
>
> Not quite sure I understand you. Did you not suggest using Response.Flush
> to send some content to the client before the ASP script is completed?
>
>
>>
>> "Anthony Jones" <Ant@yadayadayada.com> wrote in message
> news:OyrJ28DuHHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > "Jon Paal [MSMD]" <Jon nospam Paal @ everywhere dot com> wrote in
> message
>> > news:1382oetmd5ubica@corp.supernews.com...
>> >> To achieve what I think you are wanting , use response.flush to show
>> > interim values while the asp page is running.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > That'll send content to the client but the component on the client end
> needs
>> > to be able to deliver that content via an event before the response is
>> > complete.
>> >
>> > The only component that can do that WinHTTP. I've never wired up it's
>> > events in script to see if that can be done.
>> >
>> >> "deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1182877319.863709.128090@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>> >> > Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
>> >> > loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
>> >> > client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
>> >> > and print them on the browser?
>> >> >
>> >> > (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the
> server...while
>> >> > it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
>> >> > the program that is running over at the server)
>> >> >
>> >> > --deostroll
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

"keyser soze" <bajopalabra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Od5Qv0OuHHA.3588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> i think
> you can use a session variable: session("progess")= 0
> wich your "process.asp" can increase whenever you want
> thus, you can retrieve it with ajax
> invoking another page like "getprogress.asp"
>

>
>
> "deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:1182877319.863709.128090@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
> > loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
> > client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
> > and print them on the browser?
> >
> > (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the server...while
> > it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
> > the program that is running over at the server)
> >
> > --deostroll
> >
>
>

"Jon Paal [MSMD]" <Jon nospam Paal @ everywhere dot com> wrote in message
news:1384qn73f42p7fd@corp.supernews.com...
> You can't check the progress of an ASP script from the client side.
>

>
> "Anthony Jones" <Ant@yadayadayada.com> wrote in message
news:OyrJ28DuHHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Jon Paal [MSMD]" <Jon nospam Paal @ everywhere dot com> wrote in
message
> > news:1382oetmd5ubica@corp.supernews.com...
> >> To achieve what I think you are wanting , use response.flush to show
> > interim values while the asp page is running.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > That'll send content to the client but the component on the client end
needs
> > to be able to deliver that content via an event before the response is
> > complete.
> >
> > The only component that can do that WinHTTP. I've never wired up it's
> > events in script to see if that can be done.
> >
> >> "deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1182877319.863709.128090@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> >> > Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
> >> > loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
> >> > client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
> >> > and print them on the browser?
> >> >
> >> > (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the
server...while
> >> > it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
> >> > the program that is running over at the server)
> >> >
> >> > --deostroll
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

>
> "keyser soze" <bajopalabra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Od5Qv0OuHHA.3588@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> > i think
> > you can use a session variable: session("progess")= 0
> > wich your "process.asp" can increase whenever you want
> > thus, you can retrieve it with ajax
> > invoking another page like "getprogress.asp"
> >
>
>
> You can't use the session object in this way since it is single threaded.
> You can't have a long running thread updating the session object and have
> another thread read it. The request to getprogress.asp will queue until
the
> long running thread has completed.
>
> It may be possible to use the application object or a DB to do the same
> thing though.
>
>
> >
> >
> > "deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> escribió en el mensaje
> > news:1182877319.863709.128090@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> > > Suppose I have an asp page that has a response.write(something) in a
> > > loop that would run for a considerable amount of time. Now, from my
> > > client browser can I trap those server response messages (using ajax)
> > > and print them on the browser?
> > >
> > > (The thing is the asp page is still running over at the server...while
> > > it is running I would want to monitor some variables that is part of
> > > the program that is running over at the server)
> > >
> > > --deostroll
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

"deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1183059844.269293.84740@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Jon Paal said:
>
>>You can't check the progress of an ASP script from the client side.
>
> I have tried using response.flush, it does not work.
>
> Technically my requirement does not deal with checking the progress of
> the asp script. Rather I want to monitor some variables at runtime.
>
> --deostroll
>

>You can't check the progress of an ASP script from the client side.

"deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1183059844.269293.84740@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Jon Paal said:
>
> >You can't check the progress of an ASP script from the client side.
>
> I have tried using response.flush, it does not work.
>
> Technically my requirement does not deal with checking the progress of
> the asp script. Rather I want to monitor some variables at runtime.
>

>
> "deostroll" <deostroll@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1183059844.269293.84740@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > Jon Paal said:
> >
> > >You can't check the progress of an ASP script from the client side.
> >
> > I have tried using response.flush, it does not work.
> >
> > Technically my requirement does not deal with checking the progress of
> > the asp script. Rather I want to monitor some variables at runtime.
> >
>
> You need to turn off the standard ASP session management and turn off ASP
> debugging before you can get ASP to process more than one request from the
> same client.
>
>

>
> "keyser soze" <bajopalabra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u18LVnkuHHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> > wait,
> > please correct me if i don't got it:
> > are you saying that a page
> > with multiple ajax requests is not possible
> > to be processed in parallel,
> > with the standard session management ??
>
> Yep. For each script to run in parrellel each needs to be executed in
> different threads. Since the session object is only single thread it can
> not be shared by two threads at the same time. Even if one of the scripts
> has no need of the session object the ASP processor has no way to know
that.
> It has to make one of the ASP scripts wait until the first is finished so
> that it can move the session object off one thread and give it to the
other.
>
> >
> > that is, i see that ajax is working on my page
> > but, behind the scenes, iis can process
> > only one request by session ???
>
> ASP can only processs one request per session. Strictly speaking IIS
> doesn't know what an ASP session is.
>
> >
> > all the work that i see ajax is doing
> > is not actually in paralell (with std session mgt) ??
> >
>
> You've got it.
>
> Note fetching other resources form IIS are unnaffected by this limitation.
> You can have the download of two XML files in parrellel but that wouldn't
> help with performance much. In fact in terms of perceived performance it
> could do more harm than good.
>
> Also note that by default IE only creates 2 outstanding connections to any
> one server and FF allows 8.
>
>
>
>

"keyser soze" <bajopalabra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u18LVnkuHHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> wait,
> please correct me if i don't got it:
> are you saying that a page
> with multiple ajax requests is not possible
> to be processed in parallel,
> with the standard session management ??

>
> that is, i see that ajax is working on my page
> but, behind the scenes, iis can process
> only one request by session ???

>
> all the work that i see ajax is doing
> is not actually in paralell (with std session mgt) ??
>

"keyser soze" <bajopalabra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uv0cEYluHHA.4800@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> it is the same on asp.net ?
>

>
> "Anthony Jones" <Ant@yadayadayada.com> escribió en el mensaje
> news:eUKWc5kuHHA.4764@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "keyser soze" <bajopalabra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:u18LVnkuHHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> > > wait,
> > > please correct me if i don't got it:
> > > are you saying that a page
> > > with multiple ajax requests is not possible
> > > to be processed in parallel,
> > > with the standard session management ??
> >
> > Yep. For each script to run in parrellel each needs to be executed in
> > different threads. Since the session object is only single thread it
can
> > not be shared by two threads at the same time. Even if one of the
scripts
> > has no need of the session object the ASP processor has no way to know
> that.
> > It has to make one of the ASP scripts wait until the first is finished
so
> > that it can move the session object off one thread and give it to the
> other.
> >
> > >
> > > that is, i see that ajax is working on my page
> > > but, behind the scenes, iis can process
> > > only one request by session ???
> >
> > ASP can only processs one request per session. Strictly speaking IIS
> > doesn't know what an ASP session is.
> >
> > >
> > > all the work that i see ajax is doing
> > > is not actually in paralell (with std session mgt) ??
> > >
> >
> > You've got it.
> >
> > Note fetching other resources form IIS are unnaffected by this
limitation.
> > You can have the download of two XML files in parrellel but that
wouldn't
> > help with performance much. In fact in terms of perceived performance
it
> > could do more harm than good.
> >
> > Also note that by default IE only creates 2 outstanding connections to
any
> > one server and FF allows 8.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>