> What has been your experience with Screenweaver, SWF Studio and Juggler??
>
> Which one is better?
>
> By the way... How do these kind of software applications relate to
> Macromedia´s Central???

>
> > What has been your experience with Screenweaver, SWF Studio and
Juggler??
> >
> > Which one is better?
> >
> > By the way... How do these kind of software applications relate to
> > Macromedia´s Central???
>
> Can't say about the first two nor the Central , my only experience is with
Jugglor.
> I have been using it since mid of 1999. That time it was the only , very
first such complex tool.
> It may not have so much power as Studio but I have never had such needs so
it is fully sufficient
> for me.
> There is few factors I take under consideration , one the most important
is reliability
> and performance than the developing team communication with end user , in
case of support.
>
> I have very tight deadlines , often given materials to work on just days
before the
> final product delivery. Usually due to confidentiality nature.
> Flash Jester prove on number of occasions to provide excellent support at
no time so I know i can
> count on them.
> They very open for any suggestions and will ask you while developing new
application
> what features you looking for , many of my favorites end up in the final
build that's why I fill
> very comfortable with Jugglor.
> I was using it in projects for companies like volvo , tag heuer , mont
blanc , very recently F1
> racing Sepang Malaysia and the coming 04 April Bahrain and the 25 April in
San Marino Imola . After
> that have Tag Heuer and McLaren presentations for Monte
> Carlo Monaco race on 23 May. Kiosks where user can explore information
about performance , car
> builds , drivers history , engineering improvements and such . All my
clients has been very happy.
> I do on regular bases kiosks , cd presentation for new products as give
away for regular clients and
> screen savers , for clients and corporate for internal use. Work with
jugglor literally every day .
> SO far , out of it I had only one report about performance problem which
wasn't due to my application
> but some other tool that ran in the background . So , I stick to what
prove to work for me
> throughout this years. No to mention , the resent release of version 2
totally nail it .
> The team add some amazing features which I try to utilize for coming
projects . The
> Marketing director who preview my demo was blown away .
>
> Well , I could say much more about these tools , as i'm using all together
, tho I don't expect you
> to like to read so much :)
>
> I would suggest download each and see what works for you , my 2 thumbs up
goes to Jugglor .
>
> By the way , they have one ore great product , you may like to check
> http://slicktv.com/?section=products_additional
>
> Regards
>
>
> urami_*
>
>
>
> <no>
> http://flashfugitive.com/
> </no>
>
>

> I've had to use screenweaver on a couple of projects, and would reccommend
> it. I'm not going to provide anything like _urami's glowing endorsement of
> Jugglor - perhaps I should try it again ;)
>
> .I can't offer a comparitive assesment - i've had a *look* at the other 2
> products at various stages of their development, but haven't ever had to
use
> them commercially.
>
> Screeweaver intergrates pretty seamelessly with the Flash API, giving you
> access to it's methods through additional commands rather than the use of
> fscommand.
>
> Appeared stable, and did what was asked of it.
>
> Documentation was pretty bad, with a couple of their own as examples being
> plain wrong.
>
> }`¬P
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------
> http://www.phageinteractive.com
> PhageInteractive Ltd.
> remove mm_ to mail
> ---------------------------------------
> 'I wish we lived in a world where it was possible to be religious and
think
> at the same time.' - Jonh Graves
>
>
>