[quoted text, click to view] > Ok. Show me the Director forum, and I'll post there...
I don't know if you're posting from a news client, such as Outlook
Express, or from your browser. If you're in a browser, look to the main
nav, click Support > Forums, then find Director under the Product Forums
section. If you're in a news client, open forums.macromedia.com and find
the macromedia.director.basics group.
[quoted text, click to view] > I am well aware of the forum rules.
So ... they just don't apply to you?
[quoted text, click to view] > After an hour, though, my post was on page 3! No one's going
> to see it there.
That tells me you *are* in a browser. News clients, which many of the
contributors here use, don't have pages, so this isn't a consideration.
Bumping your posts doesn't affect their standing in news clients at all. In
the browser version, they put your post at the top again, which is
effectively as rude as cutting in line.
Sometimes questions aren't answered for days. And in any case, what
makes your question more urgent than someone else's -- more important than
people who don't bump? Many people who answer questions search for topics
in their expertise and do, in fact, find questions three pages deep.
[quoted text, click to view] > I have been courteous.
Except for the bumping, right?
[quoted text, click to view] > So, will anyone actually help me, though?
Probably.
[quoted text, click to view] > My IE does have the plugin. I'm sure it IS an html question (in a
> sense). But it's Flash (or Director) generated html code.
HTML is HTML. Flash and Director, both, generate embedding code for
you, but they can only do what browsers will accept. It's possible you
copied/pasted incorrectly. It's possible that the code generated is old by
today's standards.
[quoted text, click to view] > As far as code, all you have to do is view the 2 sites I linked to
> originally (the original working, but invalid & the newer, valid
> page that doesn't work in IE) to see the difference.
When it comes to plug-ins and validated code, you'll be in for
headaches, for sure. If it's truly important to you that your HTML is
validated, you may just have to live with certain plug-ins not working in a
given browser. IE happens to not be a particularly standards-compliant
browser, which is a shame, since it's so popular. There is a
valid-conscious way of embedding Flash movies (SWFs), for example, known as
the Satay method ...
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay/ .... read up on it to see the tedium and difficulties involved. There may,
in fact, be a standards-compliant way to embed DCRs, but it would likely be
just as tedious.
In the end, this truly *is* an HTML question. The Director forum may
help you better, but your best bet is to hunker down and study the object
and embed tags, get to know them, and experiment with them. Neither Flash
nor Director does something "special" to the HTML, which is a good thing:
it means you have countless resources out there, because HTML is widely
studied. I can't stress enough, though, that you may not be able to embed
this DCR with valid, standards compliant code ... the reality of that is one
of the many challenges of working in the web world, and why (for example)
one often hears mild disdain toward Flash and Director content on the
Dreamweaver forum. These multimedia files muddy the water a bit.
[quoted text, click to view] > Instead, I'm getting yelled at for everything under the sun.
Not everything, just the parts that worried people, like the possibility
of your stealing another's work -- which you've covered, and I see no reason
to disbelieve you -- and the bumping. I don't hear yelling, though, in any
case.
David
stiller (at) quip (dot) net
"Luck is the residue of good design."