flash actionscript: Context: I have a flash file that uses Actionscript 1.0 and published to Flash
player 6. There are 2 symbols in my library(for the sake of this post),
'parent' and 'child'. 'child' symbol has visuals on stage and a class bound to
it. 'parent' contains many 'child' symbols on its stage(attached at author
time), and no class definition bound to it. Problem: If I dynamically attach a
'parent', 'child' symbols inside lose thier class definition. So a runtime
trace of '_root.parentObj.childObj.myfunc' gives nothing. But if I attach a
'parent' symbol at author time, all contained 'child' class definitions exist
as expected. Also, if I attach a 'child' symbol to the _root movie, all
functions are there as expected. ... I have never seen this before, as
symbol/class definitions are a straight forward thing. And this is the first
time that runtime attaching of a 'parent' symbol means that child symbols lose
their class definitions. Has anyone come across this before? I can't seem to
figure out why some of these definitions are disappearing only in a dynamically
attached 'parent'. Thanks in advance.

Sorry about the previous post. All the paragraphs got lumped together. Try this
<br><br> Context: <br> I have a flash file that uses Actionscript 1.0 and
published to Flash player 6. There are 2 symbols in my library(for the sake of
this post), 'parent' and 'child'. 'child' symbol has visuals on stage and a
class bound to it. 'parent' contains many 'child' symbols on its stage(attached
at author time), and no class definition bound to it. <br><br> Problem: <br>
If I dynamically attach a 'parent', 'child' symbols inside lose thier class
definition. So a runtime trace of '_root.parentObj.childObj.myfunc' gives
nothing. But if I attach a 'parent' symbol at author time, all contained
'child' class definitions exist as expected. Also, if I attach a 'child' symbol
to the _root movie, all functions are there as expected. <br><br> ... I have
never seen this before, as symbol/class definitions are a straight forward
thing. And this is the first time that runtime attaching of a 'parent' symbol
means that child symbols lose their class definitions. Has anyone come across
this before? I can't seem to figure out why some of these definitions are
disappearing only in a dynamically attached 'parent'. Thanks in advance.