[quoted text, click to view] Pascal Soveaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> WebResponse contentlength returns an Int64 BUT HttpWebRequest.AddRange
> takes an Int32.
>
> Please point me to the specification that requires a range to be pass as
> an Int32, AFAIK 1 or more digit is not a synonym for Int32.
>
> Here is the detail of the communication.
>
> I : "Server, tell me how big is that file please" (you have to be polite
> when you are talking to a Server)
> Server : "Well boy that's a pretty huge file : 6 gb. But you know I am
> smart, that's why I am the server and you are the client, you just have
> to ask for a part of that file. Tell me which part you want to retrieve,
> where to start and optionally where to stop, and I will send that part
> to you"
> I : "Look I already downloaded the first 5 gb, so let's me see...say
> hmmm... 6 - 5... where is the shortcut for the calc? hummm... I think
> that I just need the last giga"
> - I : webRequest.Headers.Add("range", 5 Gb)
> - WebRequest = "Oh, noooo! you cannot do that, use AddRange and I will
> take care of that for you."
> - I : "Ok let's do that..."
> - I : webRequest.AddRange(from)
> - Compiler : "Oh dork! WTF are you trying to do with this Int64, huh?
> RTFM, I'll keep an eye on you pal..."
> - I : "But what?! WebRequest? Don't you accept an Int64 as a valid range
> value ? "
> - WebRequest = "Actually...I am afraid not. You will have to download
> this huge file at once...Hey! But wait till .NET 4.5, you will have some
> powerful functions like P2P, enforced design patterns, DTC and a lot
> more..."
> - I : "Ok, sounds great! But...for now, I just want to be able to use
> something for which the specifications exist for years! Do I have to
> reinvent the wheel?"
> - WebRequest : "Well, I am afraid yes. But you should ask the community
> first. I am pretty sure that you are not the first person to face this
> problem. I remember my grandfather, wininet, has more or less the same
> problem. That's genetic...or by design as we use to say here!"
> - I : "...the same old new thing..."
>
> Any idea?
>
> Pascal
