.Net framework 1.1 2 and 3 -- dotnet framework

Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)
4/12/2007 11:37:33 AM

When you install 2.0, it will, by default, take over the web server. This is
most likely why you are having problems. you can overcome this in 1.1 by
setting up separate app pools and running the 1.1 apps in the 1.1 pool and
the 2.0 in the 2.0 pool.

Beyond that 1.1 and 2.0 run completely side by side.

3.0 is an extension of 2.0, so you have to install it after 2.0. 3.5, which
comes out with Orcas, will be the same way.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com

*********************************************
Think outside the box!
*********************************************
[quoted text, click to view]

Alex Meleta
4/12/2007 3:38:35 PM

The .NET Framework 3.0 includes the .NET Framework 2.0 components and
doesn't include 1.1.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/aa663314.aspx

WBR, Alex Meleta
[http://devkids.blogspot.com/]

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul [mailto:noone@hometoday.com]
Posted At: Thursday, April 12, 2007 9:03 AM
Posted To: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework
Conversation: .Net framework 1.1 2 and 3
Subject: .Net framework 1.1 2 and 3

Do u have to install 2 and 1.1 beforehand?

Before .Net Framework 3?

Last time I installed 2, something that needed 1.1
wouldnt work because it wasn't installed.

(I thought 2 may have had the files required for 1.1). Obviously I was
wrong!

And I couldnt install 1.1 after I had installed 2.

I had to reformat!

Any info appreciated

Thanx

Paul
4/13/2007 12:00:00 AM

Hmm ok thanx folks for the info

Cheers

"Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)" <NoSpamMgbworld@comcast.netNoSpamM> wrote in
message news:eheB1CSfHHA.1388@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
[quoted text, click to view]

Got something to say? Click here to post a reply to this thread.

Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.

View other messages about dotnet framework

dotnet framework : .Net framework 1.1 2 and 3