captainks wrote:
> I'm confused, learning, and not sure how much sense this question will make. :)
>
> I'm using Flash to communicate with a .NET assembly via XML. However, I
> understand Remoting allows a more native (thus quicker, which I may need)
> communication. But....... (the big But) apparently it's only via
> HTTP-communication and, thus, only in a client-server environment.
>
> Yet (and the question...), I've seen mentioning of Remoting talking directly
> to a .NET Assembly.
> Is this True?
>
> I can't find any real documentation on this, but I want to rule out the
> possibility before I start designing my project to communicate via XML only.
>
> Anyone aware of this?
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> Kurt
> kurt.snyder@halliburton.com
>

"captainks" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:ct942l$ppd$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> Hmm... well, the first few lines of that url-reference state that the DLLs
> must
> be placed in the "cache area on the server". Thus a Server, running IIS,
> is
> still needed to "serve up" the DLLs for the Remoting to communicate with.
>
> We're developing an app that will be offline completely - a disconnected
> workstation. I was just wondering if there was a way to have Remoting
> talk
> directly to the Assemblies w/o client-server architecture needing to be
> implemented.
>
> It looks like I'll be having to just use the standard XML Class in Flash
> and
> communicate that way, but I would really love to use communication that is
> as
> native as possible (like in Remoting) for speed.
>
> Any ideas?
>