Hi again, I've been working a lot with already existing videos, streaming local cams, and recording vids, and I've used the flash com server for all my work... It was a really good deal, and i am satisfied about what i have reached so far. Anyway, now i am facing a new requirement of streaming TV channels. Is it possible to continue using macromedia products in that field? there is a lack of resources regarding this issue, and I really would like to use the FMS in this too. Please advice whether is there a possibility, and which is better to be used. Thanks in advance.
I don't see any reason why you couldn't do this. As long as you can feed the signal to a video capture device, you can stream it through FMS. I suppose you could take a line from the TV station's boradcast feed, and pump it into a capture card on a PC. Then you just need to select the capture card as the camera device (in the Flashplayer settings) as your camera. Ofcourse, you'll need a capture card or device that has a driver Flashplayer sees as a camera.
Thanks for the reply Jay, If it is that simple, then GREAT :). Anyway, its just that i did not test it yet in a real TV channel... but what i am thinking about right now is: how can i run a video from the server, shall i create a client there, which presents the TV stream, then publish it with a specific name, and let clients connect to that stream? or is there anyway else? another question is whether there are some websites that use flash media server for there TV streaming!! i have not found any company that does so!!!! all are using WM technology... is Flash media good only for the static and saved videos? its just that i love macromedia... :), and i want it to be everywhere
AFAIK, the only way you would be able to take the browser out of the quation would be to have someone develop an application for you that uses the Flash Virtual machine without the browser plugin. That's beyond the scope of my expertise. The easiest thing to do would be to run the broadcast through a browser on a computer at the TV station (the one the program feed would be connected to)..
Hello, Thanks for the response... But, what about the second query? I'll copy it from my previous blog: "another question is whether there are some websites that use flash media server for there TV streaming (Live broadcast)!! i have not found any company that does so!!!! all are using WM technology... is Flash media good only for the static and saved videos (VOD)?" And another thing... I've seen a documentation about Windows Media Services performance along with the Microsoft Server 2003, everything was going great to the side of macromedia's flash media server until i reached the point of bandwidth available for each user and limitations... with macromedia professional license, you may connect up to 2500 users with a throughput of 25Mbps, Please correct me if i am worng, but if the 2500 users were all online, then the bandwidth for each user would be 10 Kbps !!! is this true? i've seen some documents that shows the performance of window's solution which icludes a study case: here is it: (Microsoft study case): Hardware: HP/Compaq Proliant ML530 G2 servers, dual 2.4 gigahertz (GHz) Intel Xeon processors, 4 gigabytes (GB) of RAM, 2 Compaq NC6136 fiber-optic gigabit Ethernet adapters, and a Compaq 5312 Smart Array Controller using four 36 GB Ultra SCSI 15,000 RPM hard disk drives Software: Windows Server 2003 enterprise edition, Windows Media Services. Result: Served 2600 Simultaneous users with bandwidth of 300 Kbps , WAW! Please advise, we are in the process of making a decision... and still i feel like i am missing somthing regarding macromedia.
I can't say I know of any sites doing live TV simulcasts, but then again, I've never gone looking. The pro license has 3 profiles: 100 connections/unlimited bandwidth 1000 connections/40mbps bandwidth 2500 connections/25mbps Bandwidth allotments are cumulative (not per user). Once you reach your bandwidth limit, new connection requests will be rejected, even if you haven't met your connection limit You can choose whichever profile works best for you. If you have more than one license on a given server, the profile will apply to all the licenses (you can mix & match profiles). In the case of your 300kbps video stream, it seems your best option is the 1000/40 profile. This will let you serve about 136 concurrent users on each license. Flash media server does not do dynamic compression, so your bandwidth consumption per user will be based on the bitrate of the publishing stream. You can adjust that a bit on the client side by reducing the playback FPS, but it's not going to make enough difference to make FMS more cost effective than WMS or other streaming technologies. Of course, there's the origin/edge license scheme for high volume deployments. I haven't worked with it myself, so I can't comment on how well it works. I understand the cost is somewhere in the area of $45k for 5000 users/unlimited bandwdith... but my info isn't from Adobe so don't take my word as fact on that one.
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|