i have to ask some questions....50fps? frame rate has nothing to do with load times afaik. 90fps?
TV? NTSC is 29.97 PAL is 25. 90fps is not used anywhere. frame by frame can take longer because
flash has to load a new asset each frame unless the asset is a symbol - but even with tweens, the
compiled swf is exported as a frame by frame movie anyway. it wont matter. the comment about, it
really pays to up the frame with tweens makes no sense to me - frame rate in flash is a limiter, if
animation gets too heavy such as too many tweens then the desired frame rate may never be reached as
the users' processor gets taxed.
just didnt want your response to be misleading.
******************************************
--> Adobe Certified Expert *ACE*
-->
www.mudbubble.com -->
www.keyframer.com [quoted text, click to view] mynameissam.co.uk wrote:
> Hi! Heres some answers!
>
> 1.) I find that 50fps gives a nice compromise between loading time and
> fluidity, 90 is prbably the most you want to use as this is what tv is shot at.
> It really depends what you are doing. Frame by frame animation at higher fps's
> can take so long its not worth it. Where as it really pays to up the framerate
> when dealing with tweens.
>
> 2.) I'm not sure what you mean when you say dimension. If you mean a focus
> effect then you blur part of the image in photoshop and fade in, but you seem
> to already know how to do this. I would think the acura sight is done with two
> images and one has had contrast and colour played around with to pick out
> highlights, Thats what I'd do if I wanted to copy the effect!
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Sam Goudie
>
http://www.mynameissam.co.uk