Will do. I actually meant to write that as "... 2.0, Bill", but figured I
might get a response out of "...2.0 Bill" also. =)
"William (Bill) Vaughn" <billvaRemoveThis@nwlink.com> wrote in message
news:OzJI6d3lFHA.936@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> You can work with it now. The CTPs are fairly stable and good enough to
> start building and testing applications for delivery in 2006.
>
> --
> ____________________________________
> William (Bill) Vaughn
> Author, Mentor, Consultant
> Microsoft MVP
>
www.betav.com/blog/billva >
www.betav.com > Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> __________________________________
>
> "Earl" <brikshoe@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
> news:%23yBe29vlFHA.572@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks for the thoughts guys. Just thought maybe there was something more
>> elegant than capturing an exception :=)
>>
>> Oh, and when are we to see 2.0 Bill?
>>
>> "William (Bill) Vaughn" <billvaRemoveThis@nwlink.com> wrote in message
>> news:u0F6mOSlFHA.1968@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>>> The 2.0 Framework has a number of new "factory" classes and service
>>> classes that make this easy. I'll be showing those at VSLive in Orlando
>>> in October.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ____________________________________
>>> William (Bill) Vaughn
>>> Author, Mentor, Consultant
>>> Microsoft MVP
>>>
www.betav.com/blog/billva >>>
www.betav.com >>> Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
>>> rights.
>>> __________________________________
>>>
>>> "Earl" <brikshoe@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message
>>> news:uvtO72NlFHA.1048@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>>> When I load the startup form, I want to make a check to ensure the
>>>> named server AND database (SQL2k) is available before trying to load
>>>> any data. Any recommendations?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>