want it to do. Set your step and increment to -1, this way you will not run
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <notmyfirstname@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:uiJrA1tQHHA.4744@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Neil,
>
> Are you sure that you cannot use the merge.
>
>
http://www.vb-tips.com/dbpages.aspx?ID=edb1409d-5394-468f-a63f-de3a5d92b14a >
> Cor
>
>
> "Neil" <Neil@discussions.microsoft.com> schreef in bericht
> news:B382BAF3-55AD-489D-8B2B-87148F26DF8E@microsoft.com...
>> Hi Cor,
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I have used the GUID before but in this case
>> it
>> won't help me. I should have mentioned why I was wanting the
>> AutoIncrement
>> Column...
>>
>> I have an initial dataload stage which see's my client recieve several
>> data
>> tables, each of these is combined into one table and then bound to a
>> grid. I
>> also will recieve updates to the initial data loads and new datarows as
>> time
>> goes on. I was using the AutoIncrement column as a Row Indexer something
>> along the lines of code below (excuse syntax errors). This just saves me
>> looping through the initial data table for each update I have and hence
>> it's
>> a bit quicker. Otherwise I might be looping through my initial data table
>> (2000 records) just to update 2 rows. Perhaps there is a better way to do
>> this...?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> string uniqueIdent = myUpdateRow["UniqueKey"].ToString();
>>
>> DataRow foundRow = myInitialData.Find(uniqueIdent);
>>
>> if(foundRow != null) //it's an update
>> {
>> int rowIdx = (int)foundRow["myAutoIncrementCol"].ToString();
>>
>> //Loop through all columns in the row to see if any values have changed
>> using RowIdx
>> myInitialData.Rows[rowIdx][colIdx] != updateRow[colIdx]
>> }
>> else //New Record
>> {
>> myInitialData.LoadDataRow(updateRow);
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> "Cor Ligthert [MVP]" wrote:
>>
>>> Neil,
>>>
>>> Therefore try to forget in this century the simple autoincrement id and
>>> use
>>> the Global Unique Identifier (GUID) in SQL the Unique Identifier to make
>>> ID's. You know, you are not the first with the problems you are
>>> describing.
>>>
>>> Just my thought,
>>>
>>> Cor
>>>
>>> "Neil" <Neil@discussions.microsoft.com> schreef in bericht
>>> news:B5DB0625-3D92-426F-9A0F-8B310F322697@microsoft.com...
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I'm wondering if it's possible to regenerate the increment id's in an
>>> > AutoIncrement Column?
>>> >
>>> > My situation is this...I have a client application that is recieving a
>>> > several DataTables from a service. The DataTables contain an auto
>>> > increment
>>> > column which is guaranteed to be unique within that table but I need
>>> > to
>>> > merge
>>> > the tables together to create a new table and still have a unique
>>> > column.
>>> >
>>> > Orignally I was taking the first table as a base and then adding new
>>> > rows
>>> > to
>>> > this for the other tables using LoadDataRow since the structure will
>>> > always
>>> > be the same.
>>> >
>>> > Since the format of each table is the same I'm using
>>> > LoadDataRow(myRowToAdd). I have tried creating a new
>>> > AutoIncrementColumn
>>> > and
>>> > LoadingDataRow but this doesn't work, I end up with NULLS in the new
>>> > Column
>>> > and of course non unique values in the existing.
>>> >
>>> > So I guess my question is what is the best way to create this new
>>> > autoincrement column? I'm hoping I don't have to loop through the
>>> > datatables
>>> > that come in because I will be recieving updates to all this data and
>>> > think
>>> > this could be quite slow.
>>> >
>>> > Any help appreciated.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>