It is also normal that someone let original poster know that his/her
question is pointing to wrong direction and suggest a new direction to
go/study. If you do not think it helps or you do not want to do the due
research, than you have a problem more than you can solve.
After these a few days, if you actually did the study, I really like to
believe you already got the answers to your original question. If you
haven't, trust me, a bit research on ASP.NET/IIS security configuration
(authentication and authorization) not more than a couple of hours, you
would get the answers.
If I have a question and someone points me a correct (or even possible
correct direction) to study, I'd appreciate the help very much, rather than
blaming for lack of step by step tutorial. Good luck on waiting for detailed
help, which may never come.
[quoted text, click to view] "warder" <warder@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:4DC493AD-FD44-4F91-8E8F-46ECDD63BE0B@microsoft.com...
> It is normal to post something useful when replying to someone's question.
>
> My question contained more detailed information than your response. :)
>
> If you feel I 'need more study', then please be useful and point to some
> articles that offer information related what I was asking.
>
> "Norman Yuan" wrote:
>
>> When you develop an ASP.NET application, you, as developer, should know
>> which user account is expected to run your app (by default, it is ASPNET
>> for
>> Win2K/WinXP and Network Service for Win2003, and it is configurable by
>> you
>> or by admin). It is not fixed according to OS. You or the admin have the
>> control to choose which user account to use. As long as you decided which
>> user account(s) would run your app, simply grant necessary SQL Server
>> access
>> to the user account(s). It seems that you need a bit more study on how to
>> configure IIS/ASP.NET to use different user account.
>>
>>