I am sure that the problems are purely coincidental with Adobe's takeover.
There have been security changes in the operating systems and browsers,
along with changes link the activex activation etc.
I've not seen any difference at all in the delivery of flash installation ..
the only difference is that the domain name is adobe.com instead of
macromedia.com .. its always been via a web install, and there have always
been an archive of older versions and standalone installations available as
an alternative.
I'm not saying that people aren't having problems. But I don't think it
fair to blame Adobe's takeover of Macromedia for those problems. Of course,
as macromedia now is Adobe, it is up to Adobe to get the issues resolved,
but whether they have enough cases that they can reproduce the problems on
in order to fix and test is unknown. The vast majority of people are able
to use the player without problems (or there'd be a huge outcry and press
coverage etc)
[quoted text, click to view] "piotress" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:eovs0o$dej$1@forums.macromedia.com...
>I never used to have problems downloading from Macromedia. Adobe's method
>of
> getting Flash sucks, I've done everything suggested and it still will not
> download. I am a systems administrator, licensed pc repair technician and
> have
> never been so frustrated as when Adobe took over Flash.
>
> I used to think Adobe put out quality products, this headache has changed
> my
> mind. At LEAST put mirrored direct download links of Flash on reliable
> servers, the one you use is slow and unreliable.
>
> PS: Waiting to see this message edited and/or removed.
>