Groups | Blog | Home
all groups > macromedia players flash > february 2007 >

macromedia players flash : Google Groups v Usenet



Phil Nelson
2/14/2007 2:56:49 PM
[quoted text, click to view]

I am sure there are many people out there who would be willing and
able to create such a thing. Just identify them, send along a Google
sized budget and allow a few years for development.

--
nomailplease NO[at]SPAM smyonic.net
2/14/2007 9:29:32 PM

Does anyone know of a good place to search for Usenet news? I used to
use groups.google but that's become more and more corrupt with Google-only
and Corporate-posting-only Groups over the past few years.

Do a search on "no.flash websites" for example. The first 6+ hits are
from Adobe's corporate macromedia "discussion" groups and all appear to
be moderated to insure that no flash-critical post goes unchallenged.
I'd be surprised if Google didn't receive a fat check from Adobe for
ranking this topic in such a corporation-friendly way.

I still need an unbiased source to do research. Any recommendations?

Jukka K. Korpela
2/15/2007 12:00:00 AM
Scripsit nomailplease@smyonic.net:

[quoted text, click to view]

By sending to three groups where the question is grossly off-topic and by
using a probably forged email address, you indicate disrespect for Usenet
conduct, so it would be immoral to try to help you before you learn to
behave.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
me at
2/15/2007 12:00:00 AM

alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent

http://www.forteinc.com/main/homepage.php

use the nntp feed from your ISP

Even better learn TIN one of the text based readers.


info_at_1-script_dot_com NO[at]SPAM foo.com
2/15/2007 1:15:49 AM
[quoted text, click to view]


[quoted text, click to view]

That's hilarious, Phil. You've gotten straight to the point!

I have a smaller size USENET archive (in the sig) for a few years now and
I can tell that it requires enormous amount of upkeep with all the junk
that gets tossed into Usenet daily.

As far as the OP's desire to get an unbiased search is concerned: you can
go ahead and search my archive if you want but please don't expect
Google's reach and retention. For that you need those small things
mentioned in Phil's post!

--
Cheers,
Dmitri
See Site Sig Below

-
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Follow comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html,ba.internet,macromedia.players.flash threads
| with your Firefox Live Bookmarks! Set it up at
| http://www.1-script.com/forums/
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
nomailplease NO[at]SPAM smyonic.net
2/15/2007 1:38:57 AM
[quoted text, click to view]

Evidently I should also budget some Microsoft/Google sized bucks for
astroturfing.

Adrienne Boswell
2/15/2007 2:13:16 AM
Gazing into my crystal ball I observed <nomailplease@smyonic.net>
writing in news:45d37f3c$0$14088$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net:

[quoted text, click to view]

I still use Google Groups at work because I don't have nntp access at
work. The groups I frequent are on the list that I can access once I am
signed in. If I am looking for a particular group, then I drill down to
the group I want.

Then there's always nntp through a newsreader, or some other Usenet
providers, Supernews and Easynews come to mind.

--
Adrienne Boswell at Home
Arbpen Web Site Design Services
http://www.cavalcade-of-coding.info
Please respond to the group so others can share
John Navas
2/15/2007 5:13:07 PM
On 14 Feb 2007 21:29:32 GMT, <nomailplease@smyonic.net> wrote in
<45d37f3c$0$14088$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

[quoted text, click to view]

Use Advanced Search in Google Groups, and specify the relevant Usenet
newsgroups.

--
Best regards,
Stan Brown
2/15/2007 7:44:24 PM
Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:13:16 GMT from Adrienne Boswell
<arbpen@yahoo.com>:
[quoted text, click to view]

That must be why I see so few of your articles.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
spam_only_please NO[at]SPAM comcast.net
2/16/2007 12:29:08 AM
Troll alert. And some more garbage dumped, over and over- you are the
scurge of of your own complaining. How many times will you write this
tripe b.s? Get a life.

Consider this a prompt for your top post rant! Enjoy yet another
chance to spam the world with your sig...

[quoted text, click to view]

Bob Mgr
2/21/2007 4:32:14 PM

[quoted text, click to view]

I apparently missed the memo: Now if you post on Google Groups the post is
only on Google Groups, and doesn't flow to USENET and to sonic and
supernews, etc?

Stan Brown
2/21/2007 10:44:24 PM
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:32:14 -0800 from Bob Mgr
<kilbyfan@spammenotAOL.com>:
[quoted text, click to view]

No, unfortunately. But many folks have decided that the signal/noise
ratio from Google Groups posters is so low that in self defense we
killfile everything from that source. Yes, we miss the occasional
article from someone worth reading; but if we let Google Groups
through we'd be so swamped that we'd probably miss it anyway.

See http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
Chris F.A. Johnson
2/21/2007 11:22:12 PM
[quoted text, click to view]

I don't killfile posts from GG, and I don't see anything
approaching being "swamped". The problem is nothing like what it
was a couple of years ago.

--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
===================================================================
Author:
pattib NO[at]SPAM green.rahul.net
2/22/2007 12:41:44 AM
In article <12tpp4ed5epppc2@news.supernews.com>,
[quoted text, click to view]

God do I wish. That would sure cut down on the spam.
Sadly, they're still polluting Usenet proper.

-Patti
--
Patti Beadles, Oakland, CA |
pattib~pattib.org |
http://www.pattib.org/ | http://www.urbanscapephoto.com
AddThis Social Bookmark Button