"Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]" <x-code@no-spam-please.hotpop.com> wrote
in message news:evawFdTmDHA.1284@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> > Would this not make it difficult to update the cofig data
> > as the webserver would have to be restarted if there is a
> > change in the config file.
>
> Not the webserver - only the Web application I suppose. And you could
> probably employ the FileSystemWatcher object to monitor changes in the
> configuration file and reload it if necessary.
>
> --
> Dmitriy Lapshin [C# / .NET MVP]
> X-Unity Test Studio
> http://x-unity.miik.com.ua/teststudio.aspx
> Bring the power of unit testing to VS .NET IDE
>
> "Srini" <rsrinivasanhome@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:07e501c3992d$6d43be00$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> > Hi everybody ,
> > A Couple of weeks back I had asked some practicle
> > scenarios for using the sigleton pattern.
> > Most people use the singleton pattern for storing
> > configuration related data .
> > Would this not make it difficult to update the cofig data
> > as the webserver would have to be restarted if there is a
> > change in the config file.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sromo
>