Thanks for the ideas. I think as long as I can do the same for server-side
minimum amount of codes, I will consider shifting my projects to ASP.NET. In
INPUT tag. Any workaround in ASP.NET in achieving the same result?
"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" <Steve@Orr.net> wrote in message
news:eO3w%23ANGEHA.340@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Your understanding is correct.
> If you don't need to post back to the server to handle something, then you
> probably shouldn't. Client side code is a great way to keep your code
> responsive and efficient.
> If all your users are using a recent version of IE then this can work out
> great for you, but if you have to support other browsers then it can be a
> real pain to make sure your client side code works properly with all
> browsers - you'd need to do a lot of testing and tweaking.
>
> --
> I hope this helps,
> Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
>
http://Steve.Orr.net >
>
>
> "Antonio Ooi" <antoniooi@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:OlwWyzLGEHA.2052@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm an application developer from Malaysia. I wanted to know how ASP.NET
> > server-side events vs. client-side DHTML for FORM manipulations, may be
in
> > terms of performance and practicality? To my understanding, server
events
> > will only work when user sends request to server. Any FORM object
> > manipulations will need to go through the Web server, whereas for DHTML,
> the
> > FORM objects are manipulated on the fly. The most beutiful thing of
DHTML
> > is, clicking the 'Back' button will not go back to the previous user
> action
> > for the form but it dismisses the entire page. Need your advice on that.
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Antonio
> >
> >
>
>