"Brock Allen" wrote:
> Something like this:
>
> <asp:DetailsView runat="server" ..... >
> <Fields>
> <asp:TemplateField>
> <ItemTemplate>
> <asp:Button runat="server" Text="Edit" CommandName="Edit" />
> </ItemTemplate>
> <EditItemTemplate>
> <asp:Button runat="server" Text="Update" CommandName="Update"
> ValidationGroup="YourValGroup" />
> <asp:Button runat="server" Text="Cancel" CommandName="Cancel"
> />
> </EditItemTemplate>
> </asp:TemplateField>
> </Fields>
> </asp:DetailsView>
>
> -Brock
>
http://staff.develop.com/ballen >
>
> > Can you please provide some more details?
> > The detailsview is already using templates for the fields
> > (ItemTemplate and
> > EditItemTemplate based on IBindableTemplate).
> > If I set AutoGenerateInsertButton = false, and create my own button
> > with CommandName = "New", wouldn't the detailsview provide the Insert
> > (without ValidationGroup property set) and Cancel buttons for me? I
> > don't see how I can replace all linkbuttons with my own
> > implementation. I fail to see the template here.
> >
> > Code sample?
> >
> > Thanks for your reply by the way
> >
> > !
> > "Brock Allen" wrote:
> >> You can provide a template for the buttons and as long as you assign
> >> well-known CommandName properties to the Button's then they'll
> >> behavor the same. The well-known values are: "Edit", "Update",
> >> "Cancel", "Delete" and "New", IIRC.
> >>
> >> -Brock
> >>
http://staff.develop.com/ballen > >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> I have a detailsview control in a webpart with some templated fields
> >>> on. I set the ValidationGroup property to som value on these fields
> >>> to distinguish from other web parts on the page. However, I'm not
> >>> able to set the same ValidationGroup on the submit controls on the
> >>> detailsview. Those linkbuttons(update, insert) are auto generated
> >>> now.
> >>>
> >>> 1. Is it possible to set ValidationGroup on the detailsview?
> >>> 2. How would I go about implementing the linkbuttons myself? Could
> >>> you
> >>> please provide an example. Want the same functionality as the build
> >>> in
> >>> linkbuttons give me.
> >>> 3. Any other way (best practice)?
> >>> Thanks in advance.
> >>> Kjelli
> >>>
>
>