>220 Microsoft FTP Service

>230 Anonymous user logged in
site chmod 777 file.ext
>500 'CHMOD 755 file.ext': command not understood
quit
> 221

"Bernard Cheah [MVP]" wrote:

> Don't think so, try to check/select more fields in the w3c log properties.

"Joris van Lier" <thisnewsgroup@thisnewsserver> wrote in message
news:440de779$0$11076$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> Is it possible to have IIS FTP log invalid commands?
>
> try issuing an invalid command and look at the log
>
>>220 Microsoft FTP Service
> user anonymous
> pass none@
>>230 Anonymous user logged in
> site chmod 777 file.ext
>>500 'CHMOD 755 file.ext': command not understood
> quit
>> 221
>
> But the log shows
>
> USER anonymous 331
> PASS none@ 230
> QUIT - 500
>
>
>
>

"Joris" <Joris@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:65785561-5498-4BA2-8FA7-7087032FC720@microsoft.com...
> "Bernard Cheah [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Don't think so, try to check/select more fields in the w3c log
>> properties.
>
> Can you tell me why MS chose to NOT log invalid commands, what is the
> rationale behind this? NNTPSVC logs invalid commands, as does W3SVC and
> HTTP.SYS
>
> Am i looking in the wrong place for information to help me debug a problem
> with the FTP service ?
>
> Will IIS 7 support this?

"Bernard Cheah [MVP]" wrote:
> But I will relay your msgs to the team for IIS 7, thanks.

"Joris" <Joris@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0D141533-6F20-4050-8F4B-53057C7CD2F7@microsoft.com...
> "Bernard Cheah [MVP]" wrote:
>> But I will relay your msgs to the team for IIS 7, thanks.
>
> Thanks Bernard, please let them know that pluggable FileSystem Providers
> for
> the FTP service would be great, i allready have some providers for MSH
> (monad),
> FTP seems like a real good candidate (to me) for re-using this kind of
> navigation or restricting users to certain roots (edit metabase via FTP?).
>
> Then again, MSFTPSVC could allso use some work in the security area.
>

> Got it. for the FS provider, not too sure about that.
> As for the FTPS, from what I heard it is already in the scope, not sure
> whether it will debut in final release or not.
>
>

"Wim Morrison" <wimm@wimware.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1eb9809cd348f25d98968c@msnews.microsoft.com...
> In article <OSkUC3$RGHA.424@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>,
> qbernard@hotmail.com.discuss says...
>> Got it. for the FS provider, not too sure about that.
>> As for the FTPS, from what I heard it is already in the scope, not sure
>> whether it will debut in final release or not.
>>
>>
> About time! RFC2228 is dated from 1997! Almost 10 years old. We have a
> dire need for exactly this solution, but are going to have to go to
> another FTP server just to get encrypted FTP (without a VPN or PPTP
> tunnel).
>
> --
> Wim Morrison
> abuse@html.com.au