<nic@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:1156934871.713110.37450@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> My server had two ip-addresses bound to it, mainly because I run two
> different ftp services on my Windows 2003 Standard SP1 server. Until
> now PASV worked fine (except for a wrong PassivePortRange, but that's a
> different story). But since last patch round, the server always
> responses with the first configured ip-address instead of the
> ip-address the client connected to:
>
> telnet 82.94.249.51 21
>
> 220-Microsoft FTP Service
> 220 OYPO FTP-server
> USER xxxxx
> 331 Password required for xxxxx
> PASS xxxxx
> 230 User xxxxx logged in.
> PASV
> 227 Entering Passive Mode (82,94,249,50,19,246).
> QUIT
> 221
>
> Note I make a connection to 82.94.249.51, but PASV responds with
> 82.94.249.50.
> For normal ftp clients this is no problem, although I also run a java
> applet ftp client on my webserver on 82.94.249.51, and java security
> only allows connections to/from the same ip-address the applet runs on.
>
> Does anyone know how to work around this, or which patch possibly could
> have caused this? Any help is appreciated.
>
> Nic.
>