Wow... nice nice!
"Todd Heiks" <THeiks_spam_@GreatLAkesWindow.com> wrote in message
news:e0ZCki8UIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Problem was fixed with replacesment of NICs
>
> Thanks
>
>
> "Bernard Cheah [MVP]" <qbernard@hotmail.com.discuss> wrote in message
> news:OLLR2m1SIHA.5264@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Mmm... does not look like metabase corruption to me.
>> You sure both machine setup the same? you got inetinfo.exe in the
>> firewall exception list?
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Bernard Cheah
>>
http://www.iis.net/ >>
http://msmvps.com/blogs/bernard/ >>
>>
>> "Todd Heiks" <THeiks_spam_@GreatLAkesWindow.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23%23scQOaQIHA.5692@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>I set my passive port range to 10 ports and then opened them on the
>>>windows
>>> firewall.
>>> I have also opened ports 20 and 21.
>>>
>>> With the firewall off, the client requests a passive connection and data
>>> connection gets made on a valid port in the range I set.
>>>
>>> With the firewall on, a passive FTP connection bombs right at the point
>>> that
>>> the client asks for PASV.
>>>
>>> The traffic monitor shows that the client is asking for a port outside
>>> the Passive Port Range I have specified.
>>>
>>> I then open a range of ports around and including the port that the
>>> client is asking for and connection is still not made. The Windows
>>> Firewall log does not indicate that anything is being blocked.
>>>
>>> Active connections go fine on port 20 with and without the firewall.
>>>
>>> I have also spun up another server and set it up the same and it all
>>> works perfectly.
>>>
>>> Do I have a corrupt Metafile? How would I get the original file back?
>>>
>>> Does anybody have some insight for me? Thanks.
>>>
>>> (Windows Server 2003 Web Edition)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>