Three things - first, there are a few different kinds of auditing, and file
auditing is different from auditing authentication [which I think are the .
Second, you have to be careful about what kind of auditing you enable so the
logs don't fill up with unrelated garbage. If you want to see file access
where permission is denied, only enable file access failures. Third,
auditing should show you which account is being denied access to which file,
and what kind of access [read, write, execute, etc.] is being requested.
Possibly neither of you actually read the FAQ or the link I took the time
out to post, because it states that file auditing is a two step process.
The second step, after enabling auditing, is to right-click on the folders
you wish to audit and enable auditing on those files in the NTFS security
properties. If you didn't do that, then we're not talking about the same
kind of auditing.
[quoted text, click to view] > The original problem was because of the global.asa permissions. I actually
> got the problem again on a completely different website, which was because
> the file I was calling was including other files.
If you or someone else hadn't found that web site, FILE auditing would have
helped you figure out that the global.asa file was the problem. That's why
file auditing can be helpful, because there are other locations such as
windowsroot\system32 or \program files\ where web users sometimes also need
permissions.
Even if you didn't have file auditing enabled, authentication auditing is
still possibly helpful, because people are often surprised to find that when
they select medium or high isolation in the application isolation settings,
the IWAM account may be used instead. That's the number one problem people
have when they find that .ASP files don't work.
[quoted text, click to view] > I have to agree about auditing. All I learned from that was that it
wouldn't
> accept my username / password, which obviously I knew anyway.
That's not file auditing.
[quoted text, click to view] > What you really need in this situation is something that says 'you can't
> access the resource because of permissions on file X'.
Exactly. Which is file auditing.
[quoted text, click to view] > "PL" <pblse2@yahoo.se> wrote in message
> news:%23I7rCGbtDHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >
> > Exactly what does auditing solve ? I've seen that standard answer
> > a lot of times but the messages you get in the logs are so cryptic
> > they are of no use at all.
I suspect you're not talking about file auditing.
[quoted text, click to view] > > If you are of another opinion please let me know how to intepret
> > the messages in the logs, they only say fail or succeeded, possibly
> > a user account and then some numbers.
File auditing should give you the file name and type of access being
requested.