"Doug" <dgeiste@REMOVEsnet.net> wrote in message
news:EPzSg.9171$6S3.332@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> We will be launching a new WWW site in the next few weeks, and for
> internal reasons (reasons I can't go into here), the new web site will
> need to be entirely https. I'm trying to determine what issues, if any,
> there will be when doing this.
>
> The new site is entirely different, so we expect issues anyway with people
> finding things via search engines. Of course, bookmarks would have been an
> issue anyway since the site is entirely different.
>
> I can see one issue is that if someone types in http://www..., but we can
> redirect them to the https site.
>
> So what issues can I expect if our entire site is https?
>
> Thanks!
> Doug
>
>
>

"Bernard Cheah [MVP]" <qbernard@hotmail.com.discuss> wrote in message
news:uEPCys34GHA.2144@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> issue? not much....
> things to consider is this will increase resouse usage for cpu/ram/etc as
> know iis needs to https first
> also if you have non https url? you might get prompt saying 'the page
> content secure / nonsecure url' etc warning.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Bernard Cheah
> http://www.iis.net/
> http://www.iis-resources.com/
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/bernard/
>
>
> "Doug" <dgeiste@REMOVEsnet.net> wrote in message
> news:EPzSg.9171$6S3.332@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>> We will be launching a new WWW site in the next few weeks, and for
>> internal reasons (reasons I can't go into here), the new web site will
>> need to be entirely https. I'm trying to determine what issues, if any,
>> there will be when doing this.
>>
>> The new site is entirely different, so we expect issues anyway with
>> people finding things via search engines. Of course, bookmarks would have
>> been an issue anyway since the site is entirely different.
>>
>> I can see one issue is that if someone types in http://www..., but we can
>> redirect them to the https site.
>>
>> So what issues can I expect if our entire site is https?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Doug
>>
>>
>>
>
>

"Doug" <dgeiste@REMOVEsnet.net> wrote in message
news:fJaTg.5879$TV3.5644@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> Thanks Bernard. I didn't think abut the RAM/CPU usage.
>
> The issue of getting the https error message is problem. If the end user
> types in www.domainname.com/somepage.html, they'll get the https error.
> Because we also do radio ads to content on our site, it would also mean
> the that the annoucer would have to say, "https://...", which no one will
> get because they're not used to typing, having to type it in,... or
> hearing https.
>
> So based on this, I've convinced those that securing individual pages
> makes a lot more sense than the entire site.
>
> Thanks for the response. Much appreciated!
>
> Doug
>
>
> "Bernard Cheah [MVP]" <qbernard@hotmail.com.discuss> wrote in message
> news:uEPCys34GHA.2144@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> issue? not much....
>> things to consider is this will increase resouse usage for cpu/ram/etc as
>> know iis needs to https first
>> also if you have non https url? you might get prompt saying 'the page
>> content secure / nonsecure url' etc warning.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Bernard Cheah
>> http://www.iis.net/
>> http://www.iis-resources.com/
>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/bernard/
>>
>>
>> "Doug" <dgeiste@REMOVEsnet.net> wrote in message
>> news:EPzSg.9171$6S3.332@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>>> We will be launching a new WWW site in the next few weeks, and for
>>> internal reasons (reasons I can't go into here), the new web site will
>>> need to be entirely https. I'm trying to determine what issues, if any,
>>> there will be when doing this.
>>>
>>> The new site is entirely different, so we expect issues anyway with
>>> people finding things via search engines. Of course, bookmarks would
>>> have been an issue anyway since the site is entirely different.
>>>
>>> I can see one issue is that if someone types in http://www..., but we
>>> can redirect them to the https site.
>>>
>>> So what issues can I expect if our entire site is https?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

"Bernard Cheah [MVP]" <qbernard@hotmail.com.discuss> wrote in message
news:%23aWJyfT5GHA.4644@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> You can always force user and redirect to https pages...
> for example.
> HOW TO: Use ASP to Force SSL for Specific Pages
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=239875
>
> --
> Regards,
> Bernard Cheah
> http://www.iis.net/
> http://www.iis-resources.com/
> http://msmvps.com/blogs/bernard/
>
>
> "Doug" <dgeiste@REMOVEsnet.net> wrote in message
> news:fJaTg.5879$TV3.5644@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>> Thanks Bernard. I didn't think abut the RAM/CPU usage.
>>
>> The issue of getting the https error message is problem. If the end user
>> types in www.domainname.com/somepage.html, they'll get the https error.
>> Because we also do radio ads to content on our site, it would also mean
>> the that the annoucer would have to say, "https://...", which no one will
>> get because they're not used to typing, having to type it in,... or
>> hearing https.
>>
>> So based on this, I've convinced those that securing individual pages
>> makes a lot more sense than the entire site.
>>
>> Thanks for the response. Much appreciated!
>>
>> Doug
>>
>>
>> "Bernard Cheah [MVP]" <qbernard@hotmail.com.discuss> wrote in message
>> news:uEPCys34GHA.2144@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>> issue? not much....
>>> things to consider is this will increase resouse usage for cpu/ram/etc
>>> as know iis needs to https first
>>> also if you have non https url? you might get prompt saying 'the page
>>> content secure / nonsecure url' etc warning.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Bernard Cheah
>>> http://www.iis.net/
>>> http://www.iis-resources.com/
>>> http://msmvps.com/blogs/bernard/
>>>
>>>
>>> "Doug" <dgeiste@REMOVEsnet.net> wrote in message
>>> news:EPzSg.9171$6S3.332@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>>>> We will be launching a new WWW site in the next few weeks, and for
>>>> internal reasons (reasons I can't go into here), the new web site will
>>>> need to be entirely https. I'm trying to determine what issues, if any,
>>>> there will be when doing this.
>>>>
>>>> The new site is entirely different, so we expect issues anyway with
>>>> people finding things via search engines. Of course, bookmarks would
>>>> have been an issue anyway since the site is entirely different.
>>>>
>>>> I can see one issue is that if someone types in http://www..., but we
>>>> can redirect them to the https site.
>>>>
>>>> So what issues can I expect if our entire site is https?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Doug
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>