| Groups | Blog | Home |
iis smtp nntp : Default SMTP server could't start after chenging port to 1025
I have port 25 blocked by my ISP and I want to forvard my mail to the different port and use another mail server outside (no-ip.com). As soon as I changed the port number, it stopped(smtp) and prodused this message: The service has returned a sercice-specific error code. Check the Windows Event viewer for details. In event viewer I found the next error: Event Type: Error Event Source: SMTPSVC Event Category: None Event ID: 115 Date: 2/8/2005 Time: 12:50:36 PM User: N/A Computer: ASTAR Description: The service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. Data: 0000: 40 27 00 00 @'.. What should I do cince all available ports in my case are inpossible set as a communication ports at SMTP. Alex.
[quoted text, click to view]
> Description: > The service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code. > Don't use Port 1025. Port Numbers from 1024 are used temporary from all Processes. Use a Port < 1024 or > ca. 5000 ??.
I've successfully used 10024 (that is, a port above 10000) with IIS
SMTP. All ports below 1024 are reserved, pre-assigned. Ports between 1024 and 49151 are registered ports, look them up before using 'em. Ports above 49151 are dynamic or private. REgardless, as Luts mentiones, 1024 is not available for your use, it is reserved. On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:43:42 +0100, "Lutz Elßner" <www.vb-hosting.de> [quoted text, click to view] wrote: >> Description: >> The service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code. >> > >Don't use Port 1025. Port Numbers from 1024 are used temporary from all >Processes. Use a Port < 1024 or > ca. 5000 ??. > PeterD, the Darkstar Network To email, fix my address!
Thank you for your comments.
Unfortunatly, I have only those ports open: 21,1025, 1026, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 3969 All other porta are closed or filtered. Port 1032 I use for my web-site hosting. Any attempts to set those ports as a primary ports for SMTP are failed! Alex. [quoted text, click to view] "Peter D. Hipson" wrote:
> I've successfully used 10024 (that is, a port above 10000) with IIS > SMTP. > > All ports below 1024 are reserved, pre-assigned. Ports between 1024 > and 49151 are registered ports, look them up before using 'em. Ports > above 49151 are dynamic or private. REgardless, as Luts mentiones, > 1024 is not available for your use, it is reserved. > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:43:42 +0100, "Lutz Elßner" <www.vb-hosting.de> > wrote: > > >> Description: > >> The service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code. > >> > > > >Don't use Port 1025. Port Numbers from 1024 are used temporary from all > >Processes. Use a Port < 1024 or > ca. 5000 ??. > > > > PeterD, the Darkstar Network > To email, fix my address! > ExpertZone!
blackjack 1025/tcp network blackjack
blackjack 1025/udp network blackjack cap 1026/tcp Calender Access Protocol cap 1026/udp Calender Access Protocol exosee 1027/tcp ExoSee exosee 1027/udp ExoSee solid-mux 1029/tcp Solid Mux Server solid-mux 1029/udp Solid Mux Server iad1 1030/tcp BBN IAD iad1 1030/udp BBN IAD iad2 1031/tcp BBN IAD iad2 1031/udp BBN IAD iad3 1032/tcp BBN IAD iad3 1032/udp BBN IAD and 3954-3983 Unassigned Is your ISP blocking the other ports? If so, ask them to open one up? Or is your firewall doign teh block (as it should...)? If so you can open it there... In the above list, I'd try each one and see what happens. None are commonly used, AFAIK On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:55:02 -0800, Alex Star [quoted text, click to view] <AlexStar@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Thank you for your comments. >Unfortunatly, I have only those ports open: >21,1025, 1026, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 3969 > >All other porta are closed or filtered. >Port 1032 I use for my web-site hosting. >Any attempts to set those ports as a primary ports for SMTP are failed! > > >Alex. > >"Peter D. Hipson" wrote: > >> I've successfully used 10024 (that is, a port above 10000) with IIS >> SMTP. >> >> All ports below 1024 are reserved, pre-assigned. Ports between 1024 >> and 49151 are registered ports, look them up before using 'em. Ports >> above 49151 are dynamic or private. REgardless, as Luts mentiones, >> 1024 is not available for your use, it is reserved. >> >> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:43:42 +0100, "Lutz Elßner" <www.vb-hosting.de> >> wrote: >> >> >> Description: >> >> The service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code. >> >> >> > >> >Don't use Port 1025. Port Numbers from 1024 are used temporary from all >> >Processes. Use a Port < 1024 or > ca. 5000 ??. >> > >> >> PeterD, the Darkstar Network >> To email, fix my address! >> ExpertZone! >> PeterD, the Darkstar Network To email, fix my address!
I recognized two more open ports: 3389 and 6969.
One of them is "Remote decktop access" port, so I am able to get in to my PC from my job-it is a good news for me.I tried it and it is works! I already opened all ports on my router: 1- 65535, so now what I have is what is done at ISP side(Cablevision-Optimum on line). They does not wont to open any additional ports cince I have dinamic IP and it is technical difficult for them(they want me to switch to commertial account with high price - more then $59.99/month I pay now). So, I faced the reality to deal with those ports only. I already using 1032 for my web-site hosting, 21 for FTP and 3389 for remote decktop and the only future I missing is SMTP Alex. [quoted text, click to view] "Peter D. Hipson" wrote:
> blackjack 1025/tcp network blackjack > blackjack 1025/udp network blackjack > cap 1026/tcp Calender Access Protocol > cap 1026/udp Calender Access Protocol > exosee 1027/tcp ExoSee > exosee 1027/udp ExoSee > solid-mux 1029/tcp Solid Mux Server > solid-mux 1029/udp Solid Mux Server > iad1 1030/tcp BBN IAD > iad1 1030/udp BBN IAD > iad2 1031/tcp BBN IAD > iad2 1031/udp BBN IAD > iad3 1032/tcp BBN IAD > iad3 1032/udp BBN IAD > > and > > 3954-3983 Unassigned > > Is your ISP blocking the other ports? If so, ask them to open one up? > Or is your firewall doign teh block (as it should...)? If so you can > open it there... > > In the above list, I'd try each one and see what happens. None are > commonly used, AFAIK > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:55:02 -0800, Alex Star > <AlexStar@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >Thank you for your comments. > >Unfortunatly, I have only those ports open: > >21,1025, 1026, 1029, 1030, 1031, 1032, 3969 > > > >All other porta are closed or filtered. > >Port 1032 I use for my web-site hosting. > >Any attempts to set those ports as a primary ports for SMTP are failed! > > > > > >Alex. > > > >"Peter D. Hipson" wrote: > > > >> I've successfully used 10024 (that is, a port above 10000) with IIS > >> SMTP. > >> > >> All ports below 1024 are reserved, pre-assigned. Ports between 1024 > >> and 49151 are registered ports, look them up before using 'em. Ports > >> above 49151 are dynamic or private. REgardless, as Luts mentiones, > >> 1024 is not available for your use, it is reserved. > >> > >> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:43:42 +0100, "Lutz Elßner" <www.vb-hosting.de> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> Description: > >> >> The service could not bind instance 1. The data is the error code. > >> >> > >> > > >> >Don't use Port 1025. Port Numbers from 1024 are used temporary from all > >> >Processes. Use a Port < 1024 or > ca. 5000 ??. > >> > > >> > >> PeterD, the Darkstar Network > >> To email, fix my address! > >> ExpertZone! > >> > > PeterD, the Darkstar Network > To email, fix my address! > ExpertZone!
Thank you Peter! I will check it to make sure that it is Ok to run ftp or smtp.
Regards, Alex Star. [quoted text, click to view] "Peter D. Hipson" wrote:
> Not to be an alarmist, but check your contract with the ISP to be sure > they allow you to run FTP and/or SMTP... Some ISPs do not allow either > to be run from a priavte account (mostly traffic (FTP) or > security/anti-spam (SMTP)) > > Be careful that they don't shut you down. > > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 07:51:02 -0800, "Alex" > <Alex@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >I recognized two more open ports: 3389 and 6969. > >One of them is "Remote decktop access" port, so I am able to get in to my PC > >from my job-it is a good news for me.I tried it and it is works! > >I already opened all ports on my router: 1- 65535, so now what I have is > >what is done at ISP side(Cablevision-Optimum on line). They does not wont to > >open any additional ports cince I have dinamic IP and it is technical > >difficult for them(they want me to switch to commertial account with high > >price - more then $59.99/month I pay now). > >So, I faced the reality to deal with those ports only. I already using 1032 > >for my web-site hosting, 21 for FTP and 3389 for remote decktop and the only > >future I missing is SMTP > > PeterD, the Darkstar Network > To email, fix my address! > ExpertZone!
Not to be an alarmist, but check your contract with the ISP to be sure
they allow you to run FTP and/or SMTP... Some ISPs do not allow either to be run from a priavte account (mostly traffic (FTP) or security/anti-spam (SMTP)) Be careful that they don't shut you down. On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 07:51:02 -0800, "Alex" [quoted text, click to view] <Alex@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >I recognized two more open ports: 3389 and 6969. >One of them is "Remote decktop access" port, so I am able to get in to my PC >from my job-it is a good news for me.I tried it and it is works! >I already opened all ports on my router: 1- 65535, so now what I have is >what is done at ISP side(Cablevision-Optimum on line). They does not wont to >open any additional ports cince I have dinamic IP and it is technical >difficult for them(they want me to switch to commertial account with high >price - more then $59.99/month I pay now). >So, I faced the reality to deal with those ports only. I already using 1032 >for my web-site hosting, 21 for FTP and 3389 for remote decktop and the only >future I missing is SMTP PeterD, the Darkstar Network To email, fix my address!
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |