> I doubt there is a best practices on this... I prefer to match domains
> so that the emails look more professional. Nothing more confusing than
> to get an email from Y when you expected it to be from X.

wrote:

>Is it best to use one domain for all email or create an email domain for
>each web site domain?
>For instance, lets say my hosting server is domainMaster and there are 10
>web sites being hosted on this server.
>For simplicity lets say the web sites are company1.com, company2.com, etc.
>
>So is it best (preferred) to create the pop email accounts on mail.domain
>domainMaster.com and then alias to each company domain?
>Or do you prefer to create an email domain for each company?
>
>I see hosting companies do it both ways and I want to understand the
>advantages/disadvantages for each.
>
>Hope this makes sense.
>
>Thanks,
>Steve
>

wrote:

>> I doubt there is a best practices on this... I prefer to match domains
>> so that the emails look more professional. Nothing more confusing than
>> to get an email from Y when you expected it to be from X.
>
>That's what my thought was. So I started wondering what could possible be
>saved by one domain?
>Even the admin would get confused because he won't be able to tell which
>user goes with which web site domain.
>Are there any advantages to one domain?
>
>Steve
>

"SteveT" <dev@seametrix.com> wrote in message
news:eYz96hxaHHA.4520@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Is it best to use one domain for all email or create an email domain for
> each web site domain?
> For instance, lets say my hosting server is domainMaster and there are 10
> web sites being hosted on this server.
> For simplicity lets say the web sites are company1.com, company2.com, etc.
>
> So is it best (preferred) to create the pop email accounts on mail.domain
> domainMaster.com and then alias to each company domain?
> Or do you prefer to create an email domain for each company?
>
> I see hosting companies do it both ways and I want to understand the
> advantages/disadvantages for each.
>
> Hope this makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
>
>