resources. To ascertain what standard those resources are, is up to you, so
"Jo Davis" <j@j.com> wrote in message
news:422abee0$0$38039$5a6aecb4@news.aaisp.net.uk...
> Thanks John.
>
> The reason they are attractive is that they offer client access to SQL
> Server at a low price. Most Microsoft (shared) hosting only seems to allow
> ASP access to SQL Server. The idea is to allow access to the SQL Server
> from a local VB/Access client, for 2 specified uses, and web, read only
> access, for everybody else.
>
> The databases are named by them - SQLDB1234 or whatever. When I tried to
> access databases that weren't mine, I couldn't, though I agree it's
> probably weak. For instance the names of DTS packages are displayed. Most
> of them seemed to be password protected, but even so, the names gave a lot
> away.
>
> I'll investigate some more, bearing in ming your questions.
>
> The price is attractive. As a way of sharing a SQL Server db which also
> allows client access, the other alternatives seem to be colo/dedicated
> servers, which generally seem to be 4 or 5 times more expensive. Or
> actually hosting here on the end of a DSL line. And to be honest I've more
> faith in their ability to secure a server than I have in mine.
>
> Cheers, Jo
>
>
>
> "John Bell" <jbellnewsposts@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:422ab516$0$32609$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk...
>> Hi
>>
>> "Jo Davis" <j@j.com> wrote in message
>> news:4229b9aa$0$38042$5a6aecb4@news.aaisp.net.uk...
>>>
www.shanje.com >>>
>>> does sql server hosting, on shared servers, at a reasonable price. It
>>> seems. They also allow client connections. Just playing around I've
>>> managed to connect an Access Data Project to a SQL Server database, and
>>> to access the database from Enterprise Manager (running locally).
>>>
>>> First of all - what does anybody think of that as a general idea - local
>>> client, connecting to MS SQL Server running on a shared host, connecting
>>> over the internet (ADSL here). Speed looket OK ish, but of course I
>>> haven't done any real stress testing.
>>
>> If you can anyone can! They must be using SQL Server Authentication which
>> is not as strong as windows. As the database server is open to the
>> outside world the area of exposure is larger than absolutely necessary.
>> Have they changed from the default port? Are they using encryption? What
>> version are they on?
>>
>>>
>>> Second. In enterprise manager I could see ALL the database, though I
>>> could only access mine. What's the security implications of this
>>> approach?
>>
>> What's in a name, someone may be attracted to a database called
>> MultinationalCorpsPayroll!!!
>>
>>>
>>> Third. Anybody got any experience of Shanje? Service/uptime/value etc.
>>> Or is there anybody else offering a similar service?
>>>
>>
>> Not me, and maybe if you answered any of my questions you should be
>> thinking about moving, they may already be quite busy!!!
>>
>>> Cheers, Jo
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>
>