all groups > sql server clustering > october 2003 > threads for october 8 - 14, 2003
Filter by week: 1 2 3 4 5
Reducing Spam Associated with Posting to Newsgroups
Posted by Stephen Dybing [MSFT] at 10/14/2003 3:16:08 PM
Due to a recent increase in spam sent to posters in newsgroups, Microsoft
advises that newsgroup participants should consider avoiding posting to
newsgroups using their real email address. Microsoft is also committed to
continuing to address the issue of spam from a technological perspective.
... more >>
Clustering Technologies
Posted by Veets at 10/14/2003 8:31:47 AM
All,
I've been assigned the task of evaluating various clustering technologies &
I'm just curious if anyone has experience working with either Veritas
Cluster Server or NSI's GeoCluster in a Windows 2000 SQL server
environment. Were you happy with results? Any hidden gotchas (apart from the
$$... more >>
problem with aggregate functions
Posted by mohsen akhavan at 10/13/2003 5:54:53 AM
I want to find out which branch has the higher total amount orderd.
in this query:
select branch,max(sum(amt))
from orders
group by branch
that (amt)is the (amount of order)as one field of orders table.
that gives this error :
you can not take an aggregrate of an agg... more >>
Clustering Clarification
Posted by Jim Walters at 10/10/2003 9:23:26 AM
Hello, I'm looking at getting a Compaq DL380 Clusrter and have received
conflicting info on the requirements.
On on hand I'm told by a reseller that I need to buy (2) licenses of Windows
Server 2000 Enterprise Edition and (2) Cluster licenses of SQL 2000 with
sells for about $18,000 I'm told.
... more >>
Prerequisits and one Question...
Posted by Mirco at 10/9/2003 6:01:33 PM
Hi @All,
I've got one question to you.
We want to create a failover clustering environment, and the question is
what version of sql server we need.
Do we use an Enterprise Version or fullfills a Standard Version the
requirements of clustering?
And one more question:
The two servers ar... more >>
Database Backup in 0.5 B and Transaction log backup in GBs
Posted by Narendra Talreja at 10/8/2003 11:59:07 PM
SQL gurus,
Simple question:
Our database is 470MB and transaction log has become 18GB! (Clustered). I
see local Fixed drives in both the SQL boxes from 'System Information' and
disk manager where data is being stored.
We are backing up database once in 24 hours and transaction logs every ... more >>
Transaction log 18 G and database 470MB
Posted by Narendra Talreja at 10/8/2003 9:34:39 PM
SQL gurus,
Simple question:
Our database is 470MB and transaction log has become 18GB! (Clustered). I
see local Fixed drives in both the SQL boxes from 'System Information' and
disk manager where data is being stored.
We are backing up database once in 24 hours and transaction logs every ... more >>
Hard Drive Access
Posted by Dave Devins devins NO[at]SPAM rte.fr at 10/8/2003 6:40:22 AM
Hi
We have an SQL cluster running successfully for a few
months now. But we have a small problem when accessing the
hard drives?
The shared hard disks can be accessed through
administrative shares with no problems, but when connected
locally either the drive not availble (even if it i... more >>
Don't see what you're looking for? Search DevelopmentNow.com.
Sql clustering on W2k3 with MNS
Posted by Alexander at 10/8/2003 2:06:01 AM
As i found W2k3 cluster can be done without shared disk.
Majority Node Sets enables this configuration.
This is as Q: Is it SQL2000 can be installed on such cluster. Is it will work good.
Sorry for English... more >>
|