|
|
You're in the
sql server clustering
group:XPSMTP on 64-bit SQL 2000 cluster?
sql server clustering:
Hi all,
Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity to the issue. Thanks in advance,
To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the
moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting to use them. -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP [quoted text, click to view] "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033@posting.google.com... > Hi all, > > Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail > sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered > (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? > > I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is > said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity > to the issue. > > Thanks in advance, > > Ville Tuomola
Thanks for your reply! But is it risky to test the dll in a 64-bit
environment, will it just not work or can it mess the server up? Do you know of any other mail solution that will work for 64-bit? -Ville Tuomola [quoted text, click to view] "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@shadhawk.com> wrote in message news:<erxaLADvEHA.2564@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>...
> To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the > moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they > should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting > to use them. > > -- > Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP > > > "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033@posting.google.com... > > Hi all, > > > > Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail > > sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered > > (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? > > > > I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is > > said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity > > to the issue. > > > > Thanks in advance, > >
You need the 64-bit version of XPSMTP for that.
GertD@SQLDev.Net Please reply only to the newsgroups. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. You assume all risk for your use. Copyright © SQLDev.Net 1991-2004 All rights reserved. [quoted text, click to view] "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@shadhawk.com> wrote in message news:erxaLADvEHA.2564@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... > To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at > the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but > they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even > attempting to use them. > > -- > Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP > > > "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033@posting.google.com... >> Hi all, >> >> Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail >> sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered >> (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? >> >> I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is >> said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity >> to the issue. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Ville Tuomola > >
If you have the 32 bit version then I would not even attempt to use it.
-- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP [quoted text, click to view] "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message news:2f1323a0.0410271136.9d7397e@posting.google.com... > Thanks for your reply! But is it risky to test the dll in a 64-bit > environment, will it just not work or can it mess the server up? > > Do you know of any other mail solution that will work for 64-bit? > > -Ville Tuomola > > "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@shadhawk.com> wrote in message > news:<erxaLADvEHA.2564@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>... >> To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at >> the >> moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they >> should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even >> attempting >> to use them. >> >> -- >> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP >> >> >> "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033@posting.google.com... >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail >> > sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered >> > (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? >> > >> > I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is >> > said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity >> > to the issue. >> > >> > Thanks in advance, >> > >> > Ville Tuomola
I didn't see anything about a 64 bit version on your web site. I know you
were thinking about it. Did you create a 64 bit version already and if so where can it be found? -- Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP [quoted text, click to view] "Gert E.R. Drapers" <GertD@SQLDev.Net> wrote in message news:%23jUMcqDvEHA.1860@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... > You need the 64-bit version of XPSMTP for that. > > GertD@SQLDev.Net > > Please reply only to the newsgroups. > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no > rights. > You assume all risk for your use. > Copyright © SQLDev.Net 1991-2004 All rights reserved. > > "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@shadhawk.com> wrote in message > news:erxaLADvEHA.2564@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... >> To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at >> the moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but >> they should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even >> attempting to use them. >> >> -- >> Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP >> >> >> "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033@posting.google.com... >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail >>> sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered >>> (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? >>> >>> I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is >>> said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity >>> to the issue. >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>> Ville Tuomola >> >> > >
Ville,
Did you find the solution for 64-bit mail? Thanks, Leonid [quoted text, click to view] "Ville Tuomola" wrote:
> Thanks for your reply! But is it risky to test the dll in a 64-bit > environment, will it just not work or can it mess the server up? > > Do you know of any other mail solution that will work for 64-bit? > > -Ville Tuomola > > "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@shadhawk.com> wrote in message news:<erxaLADvEHA.2564@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>... > > To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the > > moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they > > should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting > > to use them. > > > > -- > > Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP > > > > > > "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033@posting.google.com... > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail > > > sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered > > > (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? > > > > > > I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is > > > said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity > > > to the issue. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > Ville Tuomola
We switched over to using CDonts until there's something out there worth
using, or untill SQL 2005 comes out when we can just use SQL iMail [quoted text, click to view] "Leonid" wrote:
> Ville, > > Did you find the solution for 64-bit mail? > > Thanks, > Leonid > > "Ville Tuomola" wrote: > > > Thanks for your reply! But is it risky to test the dll in a 64-bit > > environment, will it just not work or can it mess the server up? > > > > Do you know of any other mail solution that will work for 64-bit? > > > > -Ville Tuomola > > > > "Andrew J. Kelly" <sqlmvpnooospam@shadhawk.com> wrote in message news:<erxaLADvEHA.2564@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>... > > > To the best of my knowledge the xpsmtp dll is a 32 bit only solution at the > > > moment regardless of clustering or no. I can't vouch for others but they > > > should specifically state that they are 64 bit ready before even attempting > > > to use them. > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP > > > > > > > > > "Ville Tuomola" <vtuomola@gmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:2f1323a0.0410262342.1d4033@posting.google.com... > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Does anybody know if the XPSMTP extended procedure (or any mail > > > > sending functionality for that matter) works (safely) in a clustered > > > > (active-active) SQL 2000 environment running on 64-bit Windows 2003? > > > > > > > > I decided to ask before trying, because the 64-bit environment is > > > > said to be very fragile and the clustering adds even more complexity > > > > to the issue. > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > > > Ville Tuomola
Don't see what you're looking for? Try a search.
|
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |