|
|
|
June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 |
Filter by week: 1 2 3 4 Suspect Database Posted by Troy Laughlin at 2/6/2004 11:36:05 PM I have a database on the passive node that frequently gets marked "suspect." I'm looking for any insight as to why this might happen, as well as how to best handle the suspect database - restore, replicate, etc
Any information is greatly appreciated
Thanks
Troy Laughlin...more >>
SQL Cluster Posted by Balaji at 2/6/2004 1:24:00 AM Whenever Internet link is down, the user cannot connect to
SQL server 2000. The SQL Server 2000 is installed on
Win23K Cluster server.
When checked the event log,
Error ID = 17052 - [sqsrvres] Online Threat QP is not
online error occurs.
Error ID = 17052 - ODBC SQLdriver Connect Failed...more >>
MSDTC on W2K3 Posted by Stephen Strong at 2/5/2004 5:01:05 PM Does anyone know how much disk space MSDTC requires when adding to a cluster group? Does it depend on the size of the enlisted transactions??...more >>
Cluster nodes with different hardware spec Posted by Bret at 2/5/2004 3:57:55 PM Is there any issue with building a cluster with 2 nodes
(Active-passive)and with different hardware spec (but
same mem size, different number of processors and speed)?
It is temp situation until we found another hardware with
same spec as the first one. Thanks in advance...more >>
Resizing volumes Posted by Stephen Strong at 2/5/2004 2:21:07 PM Expanding virtual disks presented to a MCS cluster on W2K from a SAN works well - simply increase the virtual disk on the SAN then use diskpart (not version 1.0!) and SQL continues without a problem. Decreasing the size of a volume is not so easy. Has anyone else done this without backing up the d...more >>
Good cluster gone bad Posted by Jim Rackley at 2/3/2004 12:48:26 PM First, thanks in advance for any help you can provide!
SITUATION:
Two Win 2003 Enterprise Servers, fully updated
Active/Passive SQL Server 2000 Cluster
Shared RAID device
System has been running without error for 4 months
PROBLEM:
I can no longer failover to my passive server nor can I mo...more >>
Physical Disks vs. Partitions Posted by Michael [multnomah] at 2/2/2004 1:33:47 PM We have our 2 node SQL Server 2000 [Windows 2003] Cluster
connected to a NAS device. We have created 4 LUNs, 2 for
each node, with one DATA and one LOG. On the second node
[QAT2] we have the 2 LUNS carved up into 6 partitions [3
for DATA and 3 for LOG, K:, L:, M:, N:, O:, P:]. On the
se...more >>
8-16 instances on a SQL2K cluster advisable? Posted by Rinus Heer at 2/2/2004 6:48:10 AM Hello,
I would like to know your opinion about running 4-8 SQL 2K
instances on each node of a multi-node (2) cluster, with 8
production databases on each node (spread over the
instances).
Hardware: 2 Pentium 4 2.8 GHz dual processor systems with
2 Gb memory (can be upgraded with processor ...more >>
Don't see what you're looking for? Search DevelopmentNow.com.
Install SQL 2000 Cluster on Windows 2003 Posted by sql at 2/1/2004 11:04:00 PM Would like step by step instructions for setting up windows 2003 and SQL
2000 clustering services. I also need instructions on installing the OS as
well which is windows 2003
Thanks
...more >>
Data Posted by Viraj at 2/1/2004 5:53:13 PM I am in the planning process of upgrading the hardware on
our cluster. I need info/advice/suggestions on how to go
about this.
I am running an active/active cluster on 2 ML370 servers.
They are running Windows 2000 Advanced Server/SP2, MSSQL
2000 Enterprise/SP2.
I want to know if all I hav...more >>
CPU usage changed after upgrading to MS SQL Server 2000 from MS SQL Server 6.5 Posted by kct NO[at]SPAM emia.com.au at 2/1/2004 3:55:57 PM Hi All,
I had two Window NT 4.0 Server, say A and B... We recently upgraded
from MS SQL Server 6.5 to MS SQL Server 2000 on Computer A, and for
Computer B, I installed SQL Server 2000 from scratch. These two have a
same RAM(512MB) and CPU speed...so the setup for hardware is almost
identical...more >>
Cannot install on Windows 2003 cluster Posted by Ole at 2/1/2004 6:47:24 AM I have trouble installing default as well as named
instances og SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2003 cluster. I've
tried on a couple of different systems with the same
result.
The setup fails every time while creating virtual server
resources.
Here's the tail of sqlstp.log:
15:13:22 Begin ...more >>
|
| home · blog · groups | Questions? Comments? Contact the dn |