"ChrisR" <bla@noemail.com> wrote in message
news:%230IneMsFFHA.1936@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> OK please forgive me. I dont normally cross post, or ask the same question
> twice, but Im in quite a pickle here.
>
> Ive been using replication in a non clustered environment for years now.
> Ive
> never seen extreme slowness with the initial snapshot of replication like
> Im
> seeing currently. And to top it off my boxes are the fastest Ive ever
> used.
>
> Dual 3.0 Zeons.
> 4 gigs Ram.
> 1 Gigabit network.
>
>
> 1 way, Transactional, Continuous, Remote Distributor (on the Subscriber),
> 25
> gig database.
>
> Im getting better snapshot performance on two old, 512 mb ram development
> boxes. Could this be a Clustering issue?
>
> --
> SQL2K SP3
>
> TIA, ChrisR
>
>

"ChrisR" <bla@noemail.com> wrote in message
news:#0IneMsFFHA.1936@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> OK please forgive me. I dont normally cross post, or ask the same question
> twice, but Im in quite a pickle here.
>
> Ive been using replication in a non clustered environment for years now.
Ive
> never seen extreme slowness with the initial snapshot of replication like
Im
> seeing currently. And to top it off my boxes are the fastest Ive ever
used.
>
> Dual 3.0 Zeons.
> 4 gigs Ram.
> 1 Gigabit network.
>
>
> 1 way, Transactional, Continuous, Remote Distributor (on the Subscriber),
25
> gig database.
>
> Im getting better snapshot performance on two old, 512 mb ram development
> boxes. Could this be a Clustering issue?
>
> --
> SQL2K SP3
>
> TIA, ChrisR
>
>