all groups > sql server clustering > august 2005 > threads for august 8 - 14, 2005
Filter by week: 1 2 3 4 5
SQL jobs & Active-Passive Clustering in SQL Server 2000
Posted by krammai at 8/14/2005 12:39:01 PM
Environment: SQL Server 2000 (with SP3a) and Windows Server 2003
If a SQL Agent job is running on the active node when a failover occurs,
what happens to it? Will it restart on the formerly passive node (that then
becomes active)? If yes, will it restart at the same Job step that it was
exe... more >>
Problem installing SP4
Posted by BruceB at 8/12/2005 10:20:02 PM
Hi, when attempting to apply SP4 to a SQL cluster, we are getting the
following message.
Buffer Overrun detected!
A buffer overrun has been detected which has corrupted the programs internal
state. The program cannot safely continue execution and must now be
terminated.
This happens just ... more >>
clustering - cannot ping sql virtual name
Posted by jay d at 8/11/2005 9:58:09 AM
I have a two node cluster. Node 1 has the SQL instance running on it and
Node 2 has the cluster group and msdtc running on it. I can ping the SQL
virtual name and access SQL successfully. If I move the SQL group to Node 2,
then I can no longer ping the virtual name or access the database. ... more >>
Active/Active/Active without SAN
Posted by Lewis at 8/11/2005 4:26:02 AM
I read that its possible to implement an Active/Active/Active with SQL 2000
on Win Server 2003 Ent without SAN but could not find a good step by step
howtos to it.
Could some kind gentlemen point me to a good article ? please and thanks in
advance. ... more >>
SQL Reporting Service on Cluster server
Posted by Norman at 8/10/2005 6:24:27 AM
Hi,
If I install SQL RS Enterprise on SQL Cluster , do I have to create IIS
Cluster Resource for the "Reports" and "Report Server " web virtual
directory ?
Norman
... more >>
Upgrade to Cluster
Posted by David Fusfeld at 8/9/2005 1:05:08 PM
Hello all..
We have a Win2000 Advanced server running SQL 2000 Standard. In order to
convert this to a clustered setup, is it possible to do an in-place upgrade
of SQL? What should my steps be to make this a clustered config?
Thanks,
David Fusfeld
... more >>
Changing Windows Domain
Posted by CarolinaKB at 8/9/2005 9:52:04 AM
I have a 2 node Windows 2000 Active/Passive Cluster running SQL Server 2000
Enterprise Edition. The cluster supports a 24x365, mission critical
application.
The nodes are currently members of a Windows NT4 domain which trusts a
Windows 2003 Active Directory Domain. All user and service ac... more >>
SQL2K cluster on w2k3 vitual server name not shown in AD
Posted by Michael Chan at 8/9/2005 2:33:46 AM
Hi i have sql2k sp3 cluster installed on w2k3 server cluster. I can't find
exact match KBs, only found 243218 for install sql2k cluster on w2k.
followed the doc. but why the virtual server name not shown in AD as a
server after install? is this normal? I remember in w2k cluster, the SQL VS
wi... more >>
Don't see what you're looking for? Search DevelopmentNow.com.
Need advise on SQL Server installating in MS cluster 2k3 Majority
Posted by kenneth at 8/9/2005 1:30:03 AM
Hi can't find much on whether can SQL 2000 Enterpise server be installed in a
windows 2003 cluster majority node set. Some forum say that SQL 2000 will not
run on ms cluster mns need to verify these thank you
... more >>
Three Node cluster - Active /Active /Passive
Posted by Viking at 8/9/2005 12:14:03 AM
Hello everybody,
We are trying to consolidate our servers, by moving databases to instances
(3 nodes) running under Active /Active /Passive mode.
My doubts here are
(1) Can we ever do this? I said "Yes", it may be possible but never tried.
(2) If yes, how many virtual servers would we n... more >>
Creating a new cluster
Posted by Enric at 8/9/2005 12:09:02 AM
We have A-A cluster with two server but I would like to have another cluster.
How could I connect both cluster?
Thanks a lot,... more >>
SQL 2000 performance issue since setting priority boost option
Posted by David Payne at 8/8/2005 12:59:03 PM
With the same application concurrency and volume, we are experiencing more
spikes in latency than before enabling the priority boost option. We are not
experiencing any buffer latch time out errors. Processor utilization is
below 45%. IO is not an issue for this system throughput is. There is ... more >>
|