all groups > sql server clustering > may 2006
SQL Server Retsarting
Posted by steveh at 5/31/2006 2:04:02 AM
We have an Active/Passive SQL 2005 Cluster running on Windows 2003 Server
We have a website using a SQL database backend and have just started to
receive the following error
All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker
threads waiting on LCK_M_IS. Process Util... more >>
Database Mirroring Question/Issue
Posted by Tim Murray at 5/30/2006 10:46:05 PM
OK hopefully an easy question for the experts.
We are currently trying to design/test implement an SQL Solution to use DB
Mirroring with SQL 2005 Ent.
We have successfully built an SQL Cluster with 05' Ent SP1 x 64 on with
Windows 2k3 Ent 64bit MSCS. We also have an additional Server with... more >>
Cluster node replace windows 2003 server with sql server 2000
Posted by Replacing a cluster node at 5/30/2006 6:08:01 PM
Hello to all.
We have a cluster server in active-pasive configuration, that is running sql
server 2000. We are planning replace both nodes of the cluster (one at each
step) without taking the entire cluster offline, and it´s critical that the
sql service don´t stop when the replacement is... more >>
Need advice on hardware for SQL 2005
Posted by Slimo at 5/30/2006 4:39:48 PM
Hello,
I would appreciate if someone can give some advice on hardware for building
up SQL 2005 cluster. We will have 4 database of 50 GB each. How many
processors, memory,... do I need? My preference is to go for HP servers
Thanks in advance
... more >>
Event ID 17113 after reinstallation of cluster node
Posted by Thomas Anders at 5/30/2006 4:19:02 AM
Hi there,
got a serious problem with my 2 node cluster running sql server 2005:
After node 2 crashed, I had to reinstall it.
Configuration same as before, then I used the Change option in "Add or
Remove Software" to reinstall sql server 2005 on it.
But now, the SQL Server Service doesn... more >>
Do multi node clusters need to be virtualized ?
Posted by Hassan at 5/29/2006 12:54:49 AM
I have heard that SQL servers could benefit if they are virtualized say
using VMWare or Virtual Server in production when setting up clusters on 4
way nodes such that in the event that 3 nodes fail, then the 4th node could
run those 3 virtual instances on the 4th node.
Is that worth thinkin... more >>
More questions on 4 node cluster
Posted by Hassan at 5/28/2006 11:48:09 PM
Hello,
Say if I have 4 host names, HostA,HostB,HostC and HostD and if I want
HostA,HostB and HostC to be the active nodes, how do I go about setting up
the virtual name ?
Will HostA and HostD have a name say HostApp1,
HostB and HostD have a name say HostApp2 and
HostC and HostD have a na... more >>
Conditions for Cluster to failover..
Posted by Hassan at 5/28/2006 12:46:34 AM
Under what conditions will the active node fail to the passive node when
automated ?
Does it failover if the CPU on active node is pegged at 100% ?
Will it failover if the active node runs out of worker threads ?
Do let me know. Thanks
... more >>
Don't see what you're looking for? Search DevelopmentNow.com.
4 node cluster
Posted by Hassan at 5/28/2006 12:33:56 AM
Say If I build a 4 node cluster where 3 nodes are active and 1 is passive ,
is it possible theoretically for the 1 node to take over the 3 active nodes
onto itself should all 3 nodes fail ?
Or is clustering setup only enabled for just one node to failover at a time
?
Where can I read mor... more >>
SQL Cluster Server setup Issue
Posted by Kevin Humphreys at 5/26/2006 1:16:37 PM
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a SQL cluster server on a Active/Passive Server.
I get to the prompt where I select the Instance Name.
I want to use the default installation however the the Default checkbox is
disabled (greyed out).
I am forced to select a new instance name which I dont want.
How c... more >>
Error 18456, Severity 14, State 16
Posted by Ron McLay at 5/25/2006 3:07:02 PM
Scenario:
2 x Windows 2003 Servers Clustered,
Running SQL 2005 Clustered (Active/Passive)
All Service Packs and Patched are up to date,
Problem:
When you try to log in to an SQL Database remotely it does not
allow you and informs you that the SQL Server ... more >>
applying SQL patch
Posted by RG at 5/25/2006 2:28:01 PM
I have a three node cluster (Windows 2003 ENT with SQL 2000 SP4). We are
going to be applying Cumulative Hotfix for SQL Server Service Pack 4 Build
2187 (KB916287). I'm having a disagreement with our DBA. He says that the
entire cluster and all named instances need to come down on all three... more >>
SQL Server Clustering Training Course
Posted by Kevin Humphreys at 5/25/2006 12:55:44 PM
Hi,
Does anyone know of any training centres/courses that focus on SQL Server
Clustering in Ireland/UK?
Thanks,
Kevin.
... more >>
Clustered SQL2K5 instances with Clustered SQL2K instances
Posted by Kelli at 5/25/2006 6:55:37 AM
I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I'm caught in the middle of a
situation,and I need some expert advice.
We are running multiple SQL2K instances on W2K3 clustered servers in an
Active-Active configuration. We would like our service provider to
create a clustered SQL2K5 instance on this s... more >>
Install SQL Server 2005 in active/active clustering.
Posted by Chen at 5/23/2006 12:13:02 PM
Hi,
Our current production databases use the SQL Server 2000 EE, two named
instances with active/passive clustering. I remembered when I install the
named instances, I run cliconfg.exe first, create server alias in SQL Server
client Network Utility dialog box, then run SQL Server 2000 setup. ... more >>
Is WINS needed for a Win2K3 / SQL Server 2000 Cluster?
Posted by Greg Bradshaw II at 5/23/2006 8:21:02 AM
Hello. We are currently using Windows 2003 and SQL Server 2000 to set up a
2-node cluster with named instances. The problem that we are having is that,
if a server is rebooted, the groups that are supposed to fail over, do not.
They just go offline.
We are in the process of upgrading to ... more >>
Win2k3 Active/Active Cluster - Multiple Instances
Posted by Mike at 5/19/2006 10:23:30 PM
Hi,
I have configured a win2k3 4 node active/active sql 2005 cluster. I am a bit
confused on the ative active part. Presently I have 1 virtual server, which
runs fine on one of the nodes. How do I take advantage of the other nodes ?
I want to utilize all the nodes, keeping in mind that if 1 fa... more >>
Install SP4 + latest Hotfix
Posted by Franco at 5/19/2006 6:53:02 AM
We need to upgrade SQL Server 2K SP3a on our Windows Server 2003 SP1 two
nodes Cluster and I have a doubt regarding how to install the latest hotfix.
My intention is this:
For Service Pack:
Backup all database.
Stop all monitoring software services like MOM.
Restart the servers before insta... more >>
SQL Server Clustering - OS(64-Bit) SQL (32-Bit)
Posted by Kamal Hassan at 5/17/2006 7:29:01 AM
Currently we have 4-NODE SQL Cluster as follows:
H/W = 32-Bit processors
Windows 2003 EE (32-Bit)
SQL 2000 EE (32-Bit)
We plan to setup a new 4-NODE SQL Server Cluster with the intention to
upgrade to SQL 2005 64-Bit later.
Phase I
Set up 4-NODE SQL Cluster with following h/w & s/w c... more >>
Reasons for an Enterprise to upgrade from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005
Posted by Joe Spears at 5/16/2006 3:19:54 PM
Hi
I'm trying to put a case together to encourage my employer to upgrade from
its SQL 2000 Enterprise farm to SQL Server 2005.
We're interested in Enterprise functionality, such as:
- Improvement in backups
- Monitoring improvements
- Resilience improvements (mirroring, replication, failove... more >>
Partitioned tables over several cluster nodes
Posted by Thomas Anders at 5/16/2006 4:30:01 AM
Hi,
I try to figure out whether - and if yes, how - it works to to set up an
active/active cluster with several SQL Server 2005 instances that are using
partitioned tables.
For example, a big table with orders:
Orders A-K <- instance 1
Orders L-Z <- instance 2
Users should be able t... more >>
SQL server cluster on Win2k3. Does SQL need to be Enterprise?
Posted by jkoral at 5/15/2006 11:16:01 AM
I have a SQL server cluster running on Server 2003. I am in the process of
buying the SQL licenses. The difference in price between SQL Enterprise and
SQL Standard are a couple thousand dollars.
Does the cluster HAVE to be SQL Enterprise?... more >>
Enabling Physical Memory up to 4 Gb on cluster
Posted by ronen26 at 5/14/2006 12:00:00 AM
Hi All,
we are using:
Windows server 2003 R2 Enterprise edition SP1
SQL server 2005 Standard edition installed on shared cluster disk
2 Nodes server connecting and working with in the cluster
4 GB physical memory installed on each server
Allow the sqluser permission to Lock pages in memory... more >>
Directory Share Resource Accessibility Denied from Second Node
Posted by Tom Frost at 5/12/2006 7:27:02 AM
I've set up a win2003 enterprise 2 node cluster with an instance of sql
server on each node. It' s running SVC Pack1 and the SQL versions are 2000
with SP4 and SQL 2005 with SP1,both enterprise editions.
The above operating systems are guests on a win2003 enterpise server running
Virtual Se... more >>
Multi-Node Configuration & Behavior
Posted by Kelly Rowe at 5/11/2006 12:03:01 PM
I need a good online reference for setting up a SQL 2005 Windows 2003
multi-node cluster. An explanation of the configuration and behavior of an
A-A-P cluster would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!... more >>
Locking issues
Posted by LanLan at 5/11/2006 11:56:01 AM
Bascially, our applications seems freezing periodically when we perform the
loading test. During the test, the CPU usage is only 40% (4 processors),
Page/Sec < 0.5, Network Usage is avg 10%. Our SQL Cluster has 8GB memory, and
the new application database size is only 12MB in total. I cannot ... more >>
Step by step guides and question on converting cluster after insta
Posted by Rob DeSantos at 5/10/2006 8:41:01 AM
Building a windows 2k3 Enterprise ITANIUM EDITION x64 cluster with SQL 2005.
First, is there any step by step guides I can follow for both the version of
windows I use as well as sql 2005 in regards to clustering?
Second, I know that SQL 2005 works off instances (assigned to resource
groups)... more >>
Installing performance counters on clustered SQL Server
Posted by Nancy Lytle at 5/10/2006 8:30:30 AM
We have 2 clusters, both 2 node active/passive, both have SQL Server running
on the Active node. I am using Idera's SQL Diagnostic Manager to monitor
and gather statistics on the SQL instances.
However, on one cluster, not all of the performance counters have been
installed. I asked the net... more >>
sql server 2005 standard - Clustering
Posted by subbu at 5/9/2006 3:08:38 PM
Does SQL Server 2005 Standard edition support Active/Active(both servers
online) Cluster environment. When i check at features it mentioned fail over
(only two nodes), but it didnt mention about active/active.
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/features/compare-features.mspx
Than ks,... more >>
Change ip from one subnet to another
Posted by thanh at 5/8/2006 4:55:02 AM
I have a sql server 2005 cluster which I have to move from one subnet to an
other.
Concerning node ip, cluster, sql ressource and msdtc ip's: In which order
and how should this be done? How about the msdtc service - could there be any
problems here?
I have read kb230356 and kb244980 - bu... more >>
Performance
Posted by Sami at 5/7/2006 10:34:34 AM
A strange problem,
SQL Enterp. 64bit cluster on a Win2k3 16GB RAM, a query (Select * from)
takes 45 minutes to complete whereas it takes only 11 minutes on a SQL 2000
on a win2k cluster with 8GB RAM :)
meanwhile it takes only 6 minutes to export the entire exact table to
another table in ano... more >>
Why SQL cluster changing owner after taking offline and bring onli
Posted by Hong Wang at 5/5/2006 7:22:02 AM
Hi,
I have a failover cluster with SQL Server 2000 SP4 installed on it. The SQL
Server is on the current active node which is SQLUU. last night, I took the
SQL Server offline from cluster administrator, and then immediatelt bring
online again. However, I see the SQL is trying to be online w... more >>
How many
Posted by Markcrisp at 5/5/2006 6:01:02 AM
Hi
How many nodes can you have in a cluster?
We currently have 2 nodes one active one passive, running windows 2000 SP4
with SQL 2000 ENTERPRISE EDITION.
I ask because I want to make our setup more tolerant, so any advice is great.
Thank you... more >>
MSCluster.Cluster
Posted by GrzesB at 5/5/2006 12:20:01 AM
Hi
Is it possible to set timeout for method Open of MSCluster.Cluster class?
Thanks in advance
GrzesB
... more >>
Adding a node on SQL2005 with SP1 with no downtime?
Posted by Nils Loeber at 5/5/2006 12:00:00 AM
Hi all,
is there any way to add a new node to the cluster without getting downtime
when applying service pack 1?
Let me elaborate. Let's suppose we have a n-node-cluster and want to add
node n+1. No problem so far, we add the node, SQL Server 2005 RTM gets
remote installed. We can even d... more >>
Second Instance Connectivity Issue
Posted by JMoorhead at 5/4/2006 10:58:53 AM
I have a 2 node cluster running Windows 2003 R2 with SQL 2000 sp4 on it that
is placed in our DMZ.
There are two virtual servers
websqlcl (x.x.x.191) and websqlcl2 (x.x.x.192)
This would represent my two instances
websqlcl (first) and websqlcl2\db2 (second)
... more >>
3 node cluster with two SQL instances. Mixed SQL service pack?
Posted by JamesW at 5/4/2006 7:51:03 AM
We have a 2 node active/passive cluster running SQL2K SP4. I want to add
another node and make it Active/Active/Passive with the one active node
running the default SQL instance and the other Active running a named
instance with the passive node taking over for both instances in a failover
... more >>
Replace hardware in a SQL2000 2 node cluster
Posted by Amy Lewis at 5/4/2006 7:16:02 AM
I am currently running a 2-node (Active/Passive) SQL 2000 cluster on 2
Windows 2003 machines. Both machines are Dell PE4400 with a PERC3/DC card in
each one that attaches to a Dell PowerVault 221 (this is where all
databases/logs are kept).
Since both machines are getting old I am planning... more >>
2005 install EMC
Posted by Dale at 5/3/2006 6:37:44 PM
Question - do I have a successful SQL 2005 cluster install?
I installed SQL 2005 Standard Edition on a two node cluster. However, I had
to hit ignore 4 times when the following error message appeared:
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup
------------------------------
The setup has encou... more >>
TCP/IP Socket number on a A/A SQL2000/Server2003 Cluster
Posted by doug.masters NO[at]SPAM gmail.com at 5/2/2006 1:19:39 PM
Normally when I install SQL in a stand alone situation, the TCP/IP
Socket defaults to 1433. However when I'm installing (this is just
testing for now) the default port gets set to "0".
Do I need to manually change it back to 1433?
... more >>
SQL Loading Test
Posted by LanLan at 5/2/2006 1:19:03 PM
Well, we have a SQL cluster setup as active/passive, W2K + SQL2K (sp3). We
need to do some loading test on this box to evaluate its capacity. We already
have AWE enabled with 8GB. Our disk is SAN. My question is:-
1. Which address Performance Monitor should use to monitor the box, the
virtu... more >>
Reporting Services Clustering ?
Posted by Alex Anderson at 5/1/2006 10:47:02 AM
Hello Everyone,
Could someone tell me how to install Reporting Services 2005 as a clustered
service? I'm running SQL 2005 STD on Windows 2003 R2. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Alex Anderson
... more >>
upgrading sql2k cluster to sql2005
Posted by Gregg at 5/1/2006 7:20:01 AM
Hi,
We are running portal server front end (3 servers) and sql2k clustered
(active/passive) as the back end. We would like to upgrade to sql2005. Any
suggestions on the best method?
thanks,
Gregg... more >>
|