"Jonildo Santos" <jonildosantos@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:O4CGhSLtGHA.3548@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am confused! I can build a cluster SQL without the use of an iSCSI? Or
>be, barely with a SAN + FC?
> In which situation would need to use iSCSI in an environment of cluster
> SQL?

"Jonildo Santos" <jonildosantos@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:ehVZLRNtGHA.3912@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Russ,
> Performance is my main point. Then, I should use the FC + SAN.

> "Jonildo Santos" <jonildosantos@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:O4CGhSLtGHA.3548@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>I am confused! I can build a cluster SQL without the use of an iSCSI? Or
>>be, barely with a SAN + FC?
>> In which situation would need to use iSCSI in an environment of cluster
>> SQL?
>
> You can use iSCSI or Fiber connected SANs.
>
> Why go one way over another? Performance is a consideration, ease of
> install and maintenance is another.
>
>
> --
> Russ Kaufmann
> MVP - Windows Server - Clustering
> ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
> Web http://www.clusterhelp.com
> Blog http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp
>
>