all groups > sql server clustering > september 2006
Static Port
Posted by Adrian at 9/29/2006 4:16:14 PM
Is setting a static port for SQL server possible on a cluster? I tried this
and the service would not start, so I had to run the cluster recovery
utility to get the service to start again.
... more >>
SQL 2000 versus 2005 for High Availability
Posted by Clark at 9/29/2006 12:14:02 PM
Maybe Friday isn't the best time to ask, but here goes...
To improve our single instance sql2000 to High Availability standards, I'm
looking into clustering, log shipping, etc.
We are totally sql2k now, so we would tend to stay there. Are there any HA
features in Sql2005 that are not in... more >>
Poor performance on SQL 2000 Clustered
Posted by salva.gomez NO[at]SPAM gmail.com at 9/29/2006 4:24:20 AM
Hi all,
i have a 2-node cluster with SQL 2000. I've received many complaints
about the performance. My users tell me that the server is very slow.
The boxes are new (2 cPu Intel Xeon 2'8 GHZ and 4 Gb RAM, ...)
I have used PerfMon to see tipical counters and have seen about 100
page error/sec i... more >>
replace failed node without downtime? (sp1 question)
Posted by Karl at 9/26/2006 11:12:02 PM
Is there a manual procedure whereby I could get a replacement node up to SP1
binaries without having to interrupt service by failing the cluster over
just to apply SP1 to the newly rebuilt node?
Hopefully I'm making sense - the node that went down was a passive node and
it's been rebuilt - ... more >>
Cluster Install hangs
Posted by TX_KniveS at 9/26/2006 11:35:01 AM
Trying to install oe instance of SQL Server 2000 Enterprise (32-bit) on a
Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise two node cluster. I am installing on the
node which the cluster group is currently on. Cluster group only contains
disk drives. I have an IP set aside for SQL.
Go through the insta... more >>
Upgrading the cluster Hardware
Posted by jetski at 9/26/2006 2:37:01 AM
Hi
I've a challenge of upgrading the curent cluster hardware.
my current config:
node1 and node2 with a vs1\sql1 and vs2\sql2 respectively attached to SAN
It's important to keep the same IP address and preferred the instance name
because of my ERP database that is on node1 vs1\sql1
option 1: ... more >>
Read Only Reporting Server Active/Active Configuration
Posted by Larry Herbinaux at 9/25/2006 11:13:01 PM
I currently have an active/passive cluster acting as our OLTP TX database
server that is replicating to another active/passive cluster acting as a
Reporting database server.
I have heard that if the database is read-only (e.g. reporting server) that
it is possible to set the sql server appl... more >>
Ent Mgr. does not show databases after OS upgrade
Posted by jetski at 9/24/2006 12:46:01 AM
Hi
My configuration is Windows 2000 Adv. server SP4 and two istances of SQL
2000 sP3.
I just updated the OS from sp3 to SP4 last night and now when i open Ent.
Mgr from any desktop or console pc and when opening the Database folder on
node2 comes up with no items " i don't see any databases"... more >>
Don't see what you're looking for? Search DevelopmentNow.com.
Please Help - Restore Node
Posted by EF NO[at]SPAM nospam.nospam at 9/22/2006 8:52:39 PM
Hi All,
I really need some guidance on how to restore this. Your help will be very
much appreciated.
Setup: 2 node clustering on Windows 2000 Advance Server with MS SQL 2000
Enterprise Edition.
Diaster: Both the hard disks in the RAID 1 configuration failed on 1 of the
nodes and the wh... more >>
Cluster Failover
Posted by Scopus69 at 9/22/2006 3:22:02 PM
We have a 3rd party vendor application that runs on IIS and connects to a
back end SQL Cluster. Sometimes a user will try and run a commission report
and the SQL server takes a big hit on the CPU's (Dual 2.0 Ghz Xeon's) and I
will get a error in MOM 2005 that the "Server Performance Threshol... more >>
Questions on Mirrored Drives in Clustering Environment
Posted by Will at 9/20/2006 3:19:40 PM
I haven't used Microsoft (or Veritas) clustering software before, and I
would like to understand better whether certain disk configurations are
allowed, or recommended.
When working with a stand-alone server that is not going to be clustered,
and the storage is mission critical, my normal inst... more >>
Move 2005 cluster to new hw
Posted by Ole Thomsen at 9/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
I will have to move a 2-node SQL2005 MSCS cluster to new servers.
Wonder if I could just
- remove node1 from cluster
- add node3 to cluster
- remove node2 from cluster
- add node4 to cluster
Is this a valid plan?
Ole Thomsen
... more >>
Questions on disks
Posted by Ray Mond at 9/18/2006 12:00:00 AM
What are the reasons that you are not allowed to install the SQL Server
program files on a shared disk that's accessible from all cluster nodes?
We have a custom notification application that's written as a windows
service. We want to add it to the same resource group as the SQL Server
ins... more >>
sp4 and corruption
Posted by bijupg NO[at]SPAM hotmail.com at 9/15/2006 9:39:02 PM
Dear All
I am facing problem of recurring corruptions with sql 2000 server sp3a
windows 2000 advanced server failover cluster. is it wise to apply sp4? or is
it risky at this stage
rgds
Biju
... more >>
SQL Server 2000 SP4 (899761) AWE Hotfix
Posted by BATMAN at 9/15/2006 10:49:02 AM
Hello all...
What is the proper procedure to applying the SQL 2000 SP4 AWE Hotfix on a
cluster?
Also, has anyone had any issues with this hotfix on a cluster?
Thanks...
Michael... more >>
SQL Instance doesn't see 2nd drive in Cluster Group
Posted by bluesky4x4 NO[at]SPAM hotmail.com at 9/15/2006 6:27:05 AM
We are running Windows 2003 Cluster with SQL Enterprise 2000. We have
10 Cluster Groups setup on the server, each having two drives and a
sql instance. In cluster admin, I can see the two physical drives in
each group, but from SQL enterpise manager, on a given sql instance, I
can only see one ... more >>
fulltext verry attached to moved instance
Posted by Hans at 9/14/2006 9:01:26 PM
A few days a fail over occurred due to a network outage. After this the
event log filled with Error 823 messages. After reading books on line I
got worried since it talks about disk problems. I kind of figured out
what is going on but have not found a solution yet.
Just before the outage a ... more >>
Cluster Taken Offline Accidentally
Posted by Pinal-1 at 9/14/2006 4:14:21 PM
I have a two node cluster, and both nodes are up (this is a testing
environment) - both Virtual SQL servers are up as well. The cluster
resources are in their own group (ie, cluster IP, cluster name, Q drive,
etc). The question is...
How do you restore this Cluster Resource Group if it... more >>
How much disk for ms-dtc cluster resource ?
Posted by andrea cuozzo at 9/14/2006 12:00:00 AM
hello,
I'm about to install a 2-nodes Windows 2003 Cluster, with 2 SQL Server 2005
instances: I've read in MS documentation that clustering MS-DTC is
recommended, but I can't find how much disk space shoud I reserve for it
group: can you tell me what is the recommended disk space for it ?
... more >>
Network Load Balancing and SQL 2000 Synchronization
Posted by TONY_ZAR at 9/13/2006 9:16:02 AM
Hi
I am settingup 2 servers with Network load balancing and wanted to know how
can I make the SQL databases to Synchronize between my 2 servers is it even
possible and if yes how?
Thanks
--
Tony Zarafshar... more >>
Trying to add a Node to SQL Server 2005
Posted by Andy McDonald at 9/13/2006 8:36:02 AM
Can anyone help?
SQL 2005 has been installed on Server A, when trying to add a second node,
using these instructions
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191545.aspx no error messages are
given, but the node is not added.
The summary.txt is as follows
Microsoft SQL Server 20... more >>
Rebuilding Database
Posted by bijupg NO[at]SPAM hotmail.com at 9/12/2006 9:42:01 PM
To solve corruption issues i will be rebuilding my database sql 2000
enterprise edition sp3a on windows 2000 advanced sevrer clusterusing DBCC
CHECKDB (<database name>, REPAIR_REBUILD) .
database size is 7 gb does it require any additional space in harddisk?
Is it a safe procedure or do i ne... more >>
publishing active/active sql server
Posted by param NO[at]SPAM community.nospam at 9/11/2006 2:37:52 PM
Hi all,
I have a 2-Node Active/Active SQL2000/SQL2005 Cluster sitting behind an ISA
box. The SQL2000 which is a non-named intance i.e. default uses port 1433. I
checked this through the SQL 2000 Server Network Utility.
I then checked the SQL2005 named instance using the SQL Server Configur... more >>
Questions about configuration - urgent
Posted by tootsuite NO[at]SPAM gmail.com at 9/8/2006 9:27:46 AM
Hello,
I have a question about settings on a clustered instance of SQL Server
2005 Standard on Windows 2003 Enterprise.
In "Cluster Administrator", it is clear that our groups are not set up
for best practices. Currently, we have the following "Groups" defined:
1.) "virtual server name"
... more >>
SQL Server 2005 SP1 Cluster Install
Posted by Loren Z at 9/7/2006 3:04:00 PM
We have recently done an SQL Server 2005 Cluster install. On the secondary
node we also installed the client tools as well as integration services
using these intructions:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345193.aspx
We could not find instructions for installing Reporting Service... more >>
Cluster Resources - Windows Services
Posted by srini at 9/7/2006 1:56:02 PM
Hi,
We have Windows Services serving Client Applications. The data is stored in
MS-SQL Server 2000.
For high availability of our Windows Services to client apps, We are looking
for a Shared-nothing cluster (node 1/node 2)configuration. From Microsoft
articles we know that we could inst... more >>
two default instances on a cluster with two virtual servers
Posted by Denis Holtkamp at 9/7/2006 9:39:02 AM
we have installed SQL 2005 on a two node Windows Server 2003 cluster. the
cluster is configured with two instances, each using it's own resource group
(virtual name , IP address, physical disk).
the first instance is installed as the default instance
VirtualSQLA
now we want to install the s... more >>
Cluster Failovers
Posted by doogiesd NO[at]SPAM gmail.com at 9/7/2006 8:51:36 AM
Trying to monitor NT event viewer for cluster failover events...
Can anyone suggest event IDs to watch for that SQL 2000 failes over one
to the other....
TIA
... more >>
SQL2000 Install on Win2k3SP1 Active/Passive Failure...HELP!!
Posted by Daniel E at 9/7/2006 6:55:02 AM
I am having difficulties getting this install to take. I have a fully
functional Win2k3 SP1 Enterprise Ed. 2 Node Cluster w/the cluster group, the
msdtc group, and the sql group already built. The SQL group only contains
the SAN disk resource at this time. This cluster is running all the l... more >>
cluster installation from standalone
Posted by stephanie at 9/7/2006 12:41:01 AM
We have a standalone SQL server and want to setup clustered SQL server. Is
it necessary to re-install the SQL server or just run the SQL server setup
with 'create a SQL server failover cluster'? Do we need to re-attach/restore
the DB after the clustered SQL server setup? Thanks in advance... more >>
New physical disks not showing in drop down list when trying to add to resource
Posted by Tony Dawson at 9/7/2006 12:00:00 AM
I have had some new SAN LUNS made available to add to my SQL 2000 failover
Cluster (two nodes) running on Windows 2000 Advanced Server. They were put
in some time ago and have been showing in the Windows Disk Management list.
They were in a virgin state with no signature and unformatted. Today... more >>
/3GB boot.ini switch on a /PAE on a 16gb Win 2003
Posted by BATMAN at 9/6/2006 6:16:01 PM
Does SQL Server require the /3GB boot.ini switch on a /PAE on a 16gb Win 2003
Server? What will happen if you don't?
I know you do not use the /3GB when memory is over 16gb (With PAE...).
Thanks...
... more >>
Multiple Instances on single virtual server
Posted by Sandy Proesch at 9/6/2006 2:14:21 PM
We have a SQL Server 2005 Standard environment with 4 instances of SQL 2005
running on it. Everyone connects to these instances with the machine
name\instance i.e. server1\instancea, server1\instanceb etc.
We are now attempting to cluster this machine in order to do active/passive
failover... more >>
Help - service failure did not failover
Posted by tootsuite NO[at]SPAM gmail.com at 9/6/2006 10:52:33 AM
Hi,
re: SQL Server 2005 Standard on Windows 2003
My question:
The SQL Server service failed on our primary node last night. However,
the node did *not* failover to the secondary node.
Is it supposed to?
If so, is there something missing in our configuration settings that
prevented t... more >>
full-text not enabled (???) on the passive node.
Posted by newbie at 9/5/2006 2:10:43 PM
In a sql cluster environment I inherited:
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86)
I forced a failover to find out that full-text search isn't working.
The queries fail with
Full-Text Search is not installed, or a ... more >>
Downgrade - 2005 Ent. Cluster -> 2005 Stand. Cluster
Posted by David M. at 9/5/2006 1:17:01 PM
I have an SQL Enterprise 2005 Cluster that should have been setup as 2005
Standard Cluster. Mainly for licensing and $$ reasons I need to convert
this. It is running on Win2K3 with just some small production databases on
it (not heavy use). I am not using any special features for 2005 Enterp... more >>
Memory issue on windows 2003 SP1 cluster node with sql 2005 Ent. 64 bits SP1
Posted by Geoffrey at 9/5/2006 2:35:03 AM
Since the beginning of the week, we get strange errors in our event
log:
[sqsrvres] CheckQueryProcessorAlive: sqlexecdirect failed
[sqsrvres] printODBCError: sqlstate = 08S01; native error = 2746;
message = [Microsoft][SQL Native Client]TCP Provider: An existing
connection was forcibly closed... more >>
Question about cluster failure
Posted by tootsuite NO[at]SPAM gmail.com at 9/2/2006 11:11:43 AM
I have a question about what happens in the event that the cluster
completely breaks (whatever this may mean) - is it possible to get
SQL Server up and running on just one box? I realize that this is an
overly simplified question, and that many factors could be involved.
But, I am wondering if h... more >>
HOW STABLE IS SQL SERVER 2005 CLUSTERING ? YOUR OPINIONS WANTED!
Posted by tootsuite NO[at]SPAM gmail.com at 9/1/2006 9:26:10 AM
Hello,
I am trying to get people's opinions, experience, etc with SQL Server
2005 clustering ?
We are making some critical business decisions this morning about
whether or not to move ahead with our plan to use clustering...
We've been having some major issues with our 2 node active/passi... more >>
SQL2005 Cluster Installs
Posted by Chris Wood at 9/1/2006 8:40:12 AM
Hi,
My partner Loren had raised a question yesterday about some services only
being installed on the active side of an SQL2005 cluster at setup.
We are using clusters for development/acceptance and production. What is the
effect of say SSIS only being installed on one node of an SQL2005 cl... more >>
|